The Corner

The Imperial Obama

The month of June 2012 may be recorded as the month President Barack Obama abandoned the pretense that he believes there should be any meaningful constraints on his presidential powers.

Despite repeatedly insisting that he lacks the power to do so, he grants administrative amnesty to nearly a million illegal immigrants; the impact of the fiat matched only by the casualness with which it’s issued. Who needs Congress when you can just dictate the law to DHS?

If Congress demands information about the serial misrepresentations made by the attorney general in the Fast and Furious investigation, the president invokes executive privilege; the Department of Justice tells Congress to get lost. An allegedly coequal branch of government sulks while Obama golfs. 

When the Supreme Court upholds the ability of Arizona law-enforcement officials to check on the legal status of individuals reasonably suspected of being illegal immigrants, Obama blithely instructs the Department of Justice not to cooperate with the state. Why even go through the exercise of submitting the issue to the Court when the president can just do an executive end-run around it?  

And when an executive end-run around the Court may be a bit challenging, he can simply get ahead of it. The chief justice of the Supreme Court, despite the ostensible insulation from political coercion derived from lifetime tenure, issues an incoherent opinion upholding the greatest legislative Rube Goldberg contraption in history — this after three months of undisguised public pressure from the president and his supporters.

The president must be feeling his oats. When he doesn’t usurp Congress, he frustrates it. When he doesn’t ignore the Court, he coerces it. Marginalized checks, manifest imbalances. And throughout, the “watchdogs” in the media cheer.

But, apparently, even that’s not enough for this president. As he told Dmitri Medvedev in March, Obama is looking forward to even greater flexibility in a second term. How much more flexibility could he possibly need?

Peter Kirsanow — Peter N. Kirsanow is an attorney and a member of the United States Commission on Civil Rights.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

San Francisco Bans Fur Sales

San Francisco has banned the sale of fur. From the CBS-SF story: San Francisco has become the first major U.S. city to ban the sale of fur clothing and products. Tuesday, the Board of Supervisors unanimously approved a measure that prohibits the sale of fur clothes, accessories, even souvenirs in stores and ... Read More

For the First Time in Weeks, Relief Sweeps over Austin

Making the click-through worthwhile: The Austin bomber is done in by one of his own devices; some new numbers suggest that a small but significant portion of Trump voters are tiring of the chaos and aren’t showing up to support other Republicans in 2018; and the mixed news for conservatives coming out of the ... Read More

The Baleful Effect of #MeToo on Campus

Remember the series of hurricanes that pounded the Caribbean last summer? Something like that has been occurring on college campuses, as they're hit by one destructive mania after another: diversity, Title IX, anti-speech protests. Now it's the #MeToo Movement. In this Martin Center article, British academic ... Read More


For your amusement, I hope, I’ve done a Jaywalking episode. It begins with a bit of the overture to Semiramide -- a Rossini opera I reviewed from the Met last week. Then I get into Russia and, after a while, China. The Marriott company fired an employee for “liking” a tweet by a Tibetan independence group. ... Read More
Politics & Policy

A Time for Choosing

This year’s Conservative Political Action Conference was controversial. Invitations to European nationalist populists such as Nigel Farage and Marion Maréchal-Le Pen (the niece of Marine Le Pen) caused many longtime conservatives to question whether they still belong to the conservative movement. Vocal critics ... Read More