The Corner

An Important Speech

In Impromptus today, I start what will be a weeklong series, “SDI at 30.” This expands (greatly) on a piece I have in the current issue. Saturday marked the 30th anniversary of Reagan’s historic speech announcing our missile-defense project. What have we done with these three decades? (Not enough.)

The thing about the SDI speech — it didn’t address the new project until the final paragraphs. Most of the speech is about near-term matters, and the defense budget. And it is a superb speech, worth reading in full. Let me quote a bit:

. . . first, let me say what the defense debate is not about. It is not about spending arithmetic. . . .

What seems to have been lost in all this debate is the simple truth of how a defense budget is arrived at. It isn’t done by deciding to spend a certain number of dollars. . . . We start by considering what must be done to maintain peace and review all the possible threats against our security. Then a strategy for strengthening peace and defending against those threats must be agreed upon. . . . The cost of achieving these ends is totaled up, and the result is the budget for national defense.

There is no logical way that you can say, Let’s spend X billion dollars less. You can only say, Which part of our defense measures do we believe we can do without and still have security against all contingencies? Anyone in the Congress who advocates a percentage or a specific dollar cut in defense spending should be made to say what part of our defenses he would eliminate, and he should be candid enough to acknowledge that his cuts mean cutting our commitments to allies or inviting greater risk or both.

This is basically the theme of a piece I wrote for a January issue of NR, “Defense Is Different.” I learned to think this way, I’m sure, from Reagan, Caspar Weinberger, and the rest of those “Reaganauts” (to use Dick Allen’s coinage). They caught me when I was in high school and college. The entire weight of my education was on the other side. But I went with Reagan et al. — because they made sense to me.

Anyway . . .

Most Popular


The Inquisitor Has No Clothes

This is a column about impeachment, but first, a confession: I think I might be guilty of insider trading. At this point, I would like to assure my dear friends at the SEC that I do not mean this in any actionable legal sense, but only in principle. Some time ago, I was considering making an investment in a ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Shaming Women Who Vote Right

Some progressives have decided that rather than convincing women that their candidates and policy proposals are better than those of conservatives, they will shame women who fail to vote for the Left by defining them all as racist and self-loathing tools of the patriarchy. Think I’m exaggerating? See this ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Way Forward from the Midterms

With the 2018 midterm elections now in the rearview mirror, Republicans have been awakened to a simple fact: The laws of political gravity apply to President Trump. Democrats won sweeping victories in the House, kept their Senate losses to a near-minimum despite a brutal map, and took down-ballot races with ... Read More