Andrea Mitchell was on the Today Show this morning discussing the attack on Saddam. When she got to the tricky question of identifying what’s left of what may or may not be Saddam, she said that we do have a DNA sample of Saddam’s son-in-law. She said something like: “But intelligence sources tell me that’s not a close enough relative for a match.” Do we really need higher-ups in the CIA to tell us that Saddam Hussein’s son-in-law doesn’t have the same DNA?