The Corner

Internal Emails Show Al Jazeera English Banning Use of Terms ‘Terrorist,’ ‘Militant,’ ‘Islamist’

Shortly after news broke of a deadly January 27 attack by Islamic terrorists on a hotel in Libya’s capital, Al Jazeera English executive Carlos van Meek shot out an email to his employees.

“All: We manage our words carefully around here,” the network’s head of output wrote to staff at the Doha-based news channel’s New York and Washington, D.C. newsrooms. “So I’d like to bring to your attention some key words that have a tendency of tripping us up.”

In an email obtained by National Review Online, van Meek warned the network’s journalists against the use of terms including “terrorist,” “militant,” “Islamist” and “jihad.”

“One person’s terrorist is another person’s freedom fighter,” the Al Jazeera executive wrote.

The word “extremist” was labeled off-limits. “Avoid characterizing people,” van Meek said. “Often their actions do the work for the viewer.”

Do not use,” van Meek’s said of the term “Islamist.” He described it as “a simplistic label.”

According to van Meek’s instructions, Al Jazeera English employees are not to use the Arabic term “jihad.”

Strictly speaking, jihad means an inner spiritual struggle, not a holy war,” he said. It is not by tradition a negative term. It also means the struggle to defend Islam against things challenging it.”

Instead of “terrorists,” van Meek told his employees to use the terms “fighters” and “militants” — but only in certain contexts. “For example, we can use the term [militant] to describe Norwegian mass-killer Andres Behring Breivik or Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh,” he wrote.

In a 2013 seminar held at Northwestern University in Qatar, van Meek was described not only as “head of Al Jazeera English,” but also as the person charged with “establishing Al Jazeera in America.”

He was also given responsibility for responding to criticism of Al Jazeera’s coverage of the terrorist attacks on the offices of satirical French newspaper Charlie Hebdo — criticism driven, in part, by another set of leaked emails obtained by National Review Online that showed a sharp divide between network staff about whether Mohammad cartoons published by the French magazine served as a deliberate provocation to violence.

After spending years as something of a pariah in the West for its perceived anti-Americanism and support of terrorist groups, Al Jazeera has made a concerted effort to moderate its image by hiring a slew of Western correspondents and, in 2013, creating Al Jazeera America. As a Westerner picked up by Al Jazeera after stints at Fox News, ABC, NBC and elsewhere, van Meek was part of that push.

But internal pushback on the network’s Hebdo coverage and continuing leaks of company emails illustrate persistent newsroom tension between Al Jazeera’s roots in Doha and the media outlet’s expansion into the United States. 

Stories written on Al Jazeera’s English-language website are a mixed bag when it comes to the use of the banned terms. Those from October and December of last year — describing Islamic terrorists and German nationalists, respectively – both make use of the term “extremist.” Reference to “militants” and to a “militant group” can also found in stories describing Islamic fundamentalists, mostly in reports from autumn 2013 or early 2014.

But with one exception, the word “Islamist” is found exclusively in scare quotes. And National Review Online could find no stories where Al Jazeera English writers used the terms “terrorists” or jihadists outside the context of a direct quotation.

In a write-up of the January 27 assault on the Corinthia Hotel in Libya, which killed 8, Al Jazeera called the Islamic State terrorists responsible for the attack “gunmen.”

UPDATE: Following this piece’s publication, Al Jazeera English spokeswoman Jocelyn Austin pointed National Review Online to a Youtube video uploaded in November 2014 explaining the network’s decision to ban the term “Islamist.” The video does not mention the words terrorists,” “jihadists,” or “militants,” or explain why these are also off-limits to Al Jazeera correspondents.

Full email after the jump

From: Carlos Van Meek 

Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 10:06 AM

To: AJE-Newsdesk; AJE-Output; AJE-DC-Newsroom

Subject: Terrorists, Militants, Fighters and then some… 


All: We manage our words carefully around here. So I’d like to bring to your attention some key words that have a tendency of tripping us up. This is straight out of our Style Guide. All media outlets have one of those. So do we. If you’d like to amend, change, tweak.. pls write to Dan Hawaleshka direct who is compiling the updates to the Style Guide and they will be considered based on merit. No mass replies to this email, pls. 



EXTREMIST – Do not use. Avoid characterizing people. Often their actions do the work for the viewer. Could write ‘violent group’ if we’re reporting on Boko Haram agreeing to negotiate with the government. In other words, reporting on a violent group that’s in the news for a non-violent reason.
TERRORISM/TERRORISTS – One person’s terrorist is another’s freedom fighter. We will not use these terms unless attributed to a source/person.


ISLAMIST – Do not use. We will continue to describe groups and individuals, by talking about their previous actions and current aims to give viewers the context they require, rather than use a simplistic label.

NOTE: Naturally many of our guests will use the word Islamist in the course of their answers. It is absolutely fine to include these answers in our output. There is no blanket ban on the word.

JIHAD – Do not use the Arabic term. Strictly speaking, jihad means an inner spiritual struggle, not a holy war. It is not by tradition a negative term. It also means the struggle to defend Islam against things challenging it. Again, an Arabic term that we do not use.
FIGHTERS – We do not use words such as militants, radicals, insurgents. We will stick with fighters. However, these terms are allowed when quoting other people using them. 


MILITANT – We can use this term to describe individuals who favour confrontational or violent methods in support of a political or social cause. For example, we can use the term to describe Norwegian mass-killer Andres Behring Breivik or Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh. But please note: we will not use it to describe a group of people, as in ‘militants’ or ‘militant groups’ etc.





Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Kat Timpf Chased Out of Brooklyn Bar

Fox News personality and National Review contributor Kat Timpf was forced to leave a bar in Brooklyn over the weekend after a woman she had never met became enraged upon learning she worked in conservative media. Timpf, who has twice previously been harassed while socializing in New York City, first described ... Read More
Film & TV

The Dan Crenshaw Moment

Given the spirit of our times, things could have gone so differently. On November 3, when Saturday Night Live comic Pete Davidson mocked Texas Republican Dan Crenshaw’s eye patch, saying he looked like a “hit man in a porno movie” — then adding, “I know he lost his eye in war or whatever” — it was a ... Read More

The Present American Revolution

The revolution of 1776 sought to turn a colony of Great Britain into a new independent republic based on constitutionally protected freedom. It succeeded with the creation of the United States. The failed revolution of 1861, by a slave-owning South declaring its independence from the Union, sought to bifurcate ... Read More

Florida’s Shame, and Ours

Conspiracy theories are bad for civic life. So are conspiracies. I wonder if there is one mentally normal adult walking these fruited plains -- even the most craven, abject, brain-dead partisan Democrat -- who believes that what has been going on in Broward County, Fla., is anything other than a brazen ... Read More

There’s No ‘Neo-Jim Crow’ in Georgia

In the overtime of the 2018 elections, the Left can’t decide whether it opposes casting doubt on election results or insists on it. In the case of the Georgia gubernatorial election, narrowly lost by African-American activist Stacey Abrams, it’s unquestionably the latter. A cottage industry has grown up ... Read More
Economy & Business

Virginia Gives Away the Store to Amazon

Amazon’s deal with the Virginia state government to put part of their new headquarters in Crystal City is now official, and the details are dribbling out. Just about all of them are bad. Begin with the otherworldly claim that “regional and local transit systems have significant unused capacity, even during ... Read More