The Corner

Irshad Manji’s WSJ Op-Ed on the GZ Mosque

As those following the mosque debate may recall, I am an admirer of Irshad Manji, a real Muslim reformer. But I was disappointed in her op-ed in the Wall Street Journal this week, beginning with her above-it-all pronouncement that both the opponents and proponents have it wrong. (After painting the opposition as “antimosque crusaders” and the advocates as “warriors for tolerance,” it’s a bit rich to find Irshad decrying the “bombast” in the debate.) 

Omitting any mention of Imam Feisal Rauf’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, his praise for the prinicples of Khomeini’s 1979 Iranian revolution, his refusal to condemn Hamas, and his promotion of sharia (and mind you, Irshad expressed consternation about the Brotherhood, Khomeini, and sharia in her book), Irshad conclusorily asserts that Rauf is “not an Islamist” but “a man of dialogue.” Then, after blasting Rauf’s “insensitivity” in insisting on having the mosque near Ground Zero — because she is “offended by its proximity to the site of 9/11″ (does that make Irshad an “antimosque crusader”?) – she lists several the things about which we are suspicious, but in the dark, regarding Rauf’s project: Will it discriminate against women? Will it extend reciprocal tolerance to non-Islamic religious rites? Will it reaffirm Islam’s intolerance of homosexuals, apostates, and non-believers? Will it make gestures of inclusion to the likes of Salman Rushdie, condemned to death by Khomeini’s fatwa?

This is incoherent. Every Muslim terrorist is an Islamist, but not every Islamist is a terrorist. You can be a “man of dialogue” and still be an Islamist if your agenda is to spread sharia. Does Rauf want to spread sharia? His record certainly suggests that he does. To know with certainty, though, we would need straight answers to the questions Irshad poses. But we don’t have them, do we? And Rauf is obviously not anxious to provide them, notwithstanding that answers displaying enlightened tolerance could assuage a lot of people’s concerns. Meaning … we’re entitled to infer that, if he would deign to respond, Rauf would give Islamist answers — although he would no doubt do it in his clever, ingratiating manner.

Irshad’s got the cart before the horse. Wouldn’t it be better first to press Rauf on the important questions she has posed, and then to decide whether he’s an Islamist?

Most Popular

Sports

Hurray for the NBA

Last month, just before the Final Four, I did a Q&A on college basketball with our Theodore Kupfer. Teddy K. is back, by popular demand, joined by two other experts: Vivek Dave, an old friend of mine from Michigan, who has long lived in Chicago, and David French, National Review’s Kentucky Kid, now ... Read More
Economy & Business

Trade Misunderstandings

I was distracted by other policy topics last week but not enough not to notice Peter Navarro’s article in the Wall Street Journal, headlined “China’s Faux Comparative Advantage.” Considering Navarro’s position in the White House, it is unfortunate that it demonstrates some serious misunderstandings ... Read More
Culture

Monday Links

A Supercut of Epic Movie Explosions. Can You Solve These 10 Medieval Riddles? The cost to make a Margherita pizza: $1.77. How much restaurants charge on average for a pizza: $12. The actual costs of restaurant foods. Vintage animation lessons -- how to make things cute. London's "Great ... Read More
World

On Trade, No One Is Waiting for Washington

President Donald Trump’s flips and flops on trade are now as ubiquitous as his 5:00 a.m. tweets. Many predicted that trade-expansion efforts would come to a standstill and world commerce would suffer amidst all the uncertainty. Instead, the precise opposite has happened. In the last few months, it’s become ... Read More
National Security & Defense

Trump’s Syria Quandary

President Trump raised eyebrows recently when he ended a tweet lauding the airstrikes he’d ordered against chemical-weapons facilities in Syria with the words “mission accomplished.” The phrase, of course, became infamous in the aftermath of the invasion of Iraq, when President Bush used it in a speech ... Read More