So far, every one of the emails (just had the 8th) I’ve received on Gen. Dannatt’s comments has spoken only to the propriety of his making them.
That is certainly a legitimate issue, but it’s orthogonal to the issue of whether he is right or wrong. It was the content of Gen. Dannatt’s remarks that I posted about. The remarks might be balderdash, yet he might be fully within his rights to make them; or they might be 100 percent correct while he is a despicable rogue for having made them. Either thing might be the case.
But apparently no-one has anything to say about the contents of Gen. Dannatt’s remarks. Which I suppose tells me something.