The Corner

It’s What You Believe

Bob Novak has a column today on the opposition research being done against the president’s judicial nominees. Novak gives us an important quote in passing, without quite noting what he’s got. When asked why her organization was going after these nominees, NARAL president Nancy Keenan said that her organization was concerned about “out of touch theological activists” becoming judges. Now that’s interesting. I thought opponents of the president’s nominees were only concerned about judicial philosophy, not religious belief. Do you suppose msm will now come down on Keenan for injecting religion into politics? Will msm now acknowledge that the president’s nominees are indeed being targeted because of their faith? Will pigs fly?

Stanley Kurtz is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.
Exit mobile version