The Corner

One More Big Thing Needed for Regulatory Reform

In response to Georgetown

I was glad to see Veronique de Rugy comment on Jeb Bush’s proposals for regulatory reform. As usual, Veronique is right on target. But I would add that what is desperately needed, but that nobody is talking about by name, is an effort to completely overhaul — repeal and replace, if you will – the Administrative Procedure Act of 1946. The new law needs to give better recourse to ordinary citizens aggrieved by administrative/bureaucratic actions; more checks on executive agency “star chamber” proceedings in which the accused seem more often to be presumed guilty until proven innocent than vice versa; greater oversight powers for Congress and greater congressional opportunity to reverse agency rulings; and, to the extent there is any overlap between the APA and civil service rules, reforms of the latter.

Civil service rules themselves, along with pubic-employee union contracts, need a major overhaul. (Donald Devine, Ronald Reagan’s wonderfully “terrible swift sword” of bureaucratic reform, should be consulted.)

And Congress ought to legislate, to whatever extent is constitutionally feasible, a serious rollback of the Supreme Court’s construct of “Chevron deference” which gives the bureaucracy too much benefit of the doubt in legal disputes.

A multi-layered fight against bureaucratic overreach id desperately needed. Good for Jeb Bush (whom I do not support for president) for opening serious discussion of the subject. Now let’s see his opening bid and raise it. Plenty more chips remain to be laid on the table.

Recommended

The Latest