The Corner

Politics & Policy

Re: The NYT Ad for Sessions

In response to Odd

Mark, you write of the New York Times’s generally favorable profile of Sessions:

You get the impression the reporters themselves con­clud­ed that the left-wing racism smears are BS and just wrote a straight-news piece on him. The long article is practically an ad for the #Confirm­Sessions effort.

That is one possibility. But here’s another: The reporters have concluded that Sessions will be confirmed and the last thing they need to do is fire cheap shots that won’t have any effect when they’ll need sources at DOJ. (If you’re going to kill the king, kill the king. If you set out to take Vienna, take Vienna. And all that.) It seems to me that this is an interesting indicator for betting on which nominees bite the dust. The reporters covering the nominees are privy to a lot of firsthand information and on-the-ground perspectives. If they join or fuel a feeding frenzy, that’s arguably a sign they think the nomination will go down in flames and they want to get out in front of it. If, on the other hand, they know the nomination is a sure thing, why not curry a little favor with officials you will need to cover in the years ahead?

Now, I want to be fair. I have no evidence whatsoever that the reporters in this case are so motivated. I don’t know Sharon LaFranier or Matt Apuzzo. And whatever the reason for the fair treatment of Sessions by the Times, I’m glad for it. But beat-sweetening (also known as source-greasing) is an ancient practice in this town and we’ve seen a remarkable amount and variety of it with the incoming Trump administration. The Times may be innocent of it in this instance (that’s one of the things about beat-sweetening, it happens every day but it’s impossible to prove), but at this time of year, and particularly in this moment, I always assume it’s a factor when I see favorable coverage (or punditry!) from unlikely sources.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Demagoguery Is Not Leadership

The government of Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern in New Zealand has, with the support of the opposition, decided to enact fundamental changes in the nation’s firearms laws less than a week after the massacre at two Christchurch mosques. This is the opposite of leadership. It is also an example of why ... Read More
White House

The Media’s Disgrace

There will soon enough be an effort to memory-hole it, but the media coverage of the Russia investigation was abysmal and self-discrediting — obsessive and hysterical, often suggesting that the smoking gun was right around the corner, sometimes supporting its hoped-for result with erroneous, too-good-to-check ... Read More
U.S.

Political Theatrics

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Including all you whippersnappers under the age of 50), I’m writing this from somewhere over the Atlantic. At least I hope that’s ... Read More
Politics & Policy

What Was Trump So Annoyed About?

One of the stranger arguments that I heard throughout the Mueller saga -- and am hearing today, now that it's turned out to be a dud -- is that Donald Trump's irritation with the process was unreasonable and counterproductive. This tweet, from CNN's Chris Cilizza, is a nice illustration of the genre: Donald ... Read More