The Corner

Health Care

Joe Biden Wants to Resurrect the Individual Mandate

Former Vice President Joe Biden speaks during the second night of the first Democratic presidential candidates debate in Miami, Fla., June 27, 2019. (Mike Segar/Reuters)
Joe Biden Wants to Resurrect the Individual Mandate

Reports CNBC:

Joe Biden, former vice president and 2020 Democratic presidential hopeful, said Friday he would bring back the individual mandate, the penalty for not having health insurance, which was a pillar of the Affordable Care Act.

“Yes, I’d bring back the individual mandate,” Biden said in an interview on CNN. The individual mandate would be popular now, “compared to what’s being offered,” he added.

This is a bizarre thing to be saying in 2019.

In designing Obamacare, the law’s authors had what was sometimes called a three-legged stool in mind. One, prohibit insurance companies from charging higher prices to people with preexisting conditions. Two, because this will tempt people to wait until after they get sick to buy insurance — a behavior that drives up premiums and can lead to the dreaded death spiral, where each premium hike causes more healthy people to leave the market, leading to another premium hike — simply require everyone to get covered. And three, to make sure everyone can buy insurance, offer subsidies to those who can’t afford it.

The importance of the mandate is clear if this is how you see the law. It’s the thing that stops the preexisting-condition protections from setting off a death spiral.

But that’s not how Obamacare worked out in practice. The folks who join the exchanges tend to receive generous subsidies — which rise when premiums do — so they’ll sign up before they get sick even if they aren’t forced to. (For those who don’t get subsidies, the mandate was never all that effective to begin with, and inflicted considerable harm on those forced to buy overpriced plans with features they didn’t want or need.) Put differently, the carrots (subsidies) were far more important than the stick (mandate).

As I explained in a piece early this year, this isn’t to say there are no tradeoffs here. Killing the mandate does increase premiums, maybe 6 to 10 percent. It also means some people will choose to go without insurance, or to buy skimpy plans that don’t comply with Obamacare (an option Trump has expanded). But these are far milder consequences than Obamacare’s architects envisioned, and thus a far weaker argument for forcing people to buy a product against their will.

There’s also, of course, the politics here. PolitiFact has noted that the mandate was the least popular of the Affordable Care Act’s changes, though the degree of opposition depends on which poll question was asked and when.

As Kyle Smith put it last week, Joe Biden’s main job in this race is to look moderate and reasonable. Resurrecting a policy that was unpopular and surprisingly ineffective is an odd choice for such a candidate.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

The Other Case against Reparations

Reparations are an ethical disaster. Proceeding from a doctrine of collective guilt, they are the penalty for slavery and Jim Crow, sins of which few living Americans stand accused. An offense against common sense as well as morality, reparations would take from Bubba and give to Barack, never mind if the former ... Read More
Politics & Policy

May I See Your ID?

Identity is big these days, and probably all days: racial identity, ethnic identity, political identity, etc. Tribalism. It seems to be baked into the human cake. Only the consciously, persistently religious, or spiritual, transcend it, I suppose. (“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor ... Read More

‘Silenced’

Someone tweeted this cartoon today, which apparently is intended to depict me. A few thoughts: I love the caricature. It’s really good. I may steal the second panel and use it for advertising. I hear this line of criticism fairly often from people who are not very bright or well-informed; in truth, I ... Read More