The Corner

Politics & Policy

Joe Walsh’s Wishful Thinking

Joe Walsh at CPAC 2011 in Washington, D.C. (Gage Skidmore)

Back in the ancient days of  . . . 2016 . . . former Illinois congressman and conservative talk-radio host Joe Walsh was one of those guys calling Barack Obama a “traitor” and insisting that he is a crypto-Muslim. He has, since then, had a change of heart, and says he now regrets that nonsense. More joy in Heaven, and all that.

In 2016, Walsh was a Trump guy. Now, he denounces Donald Trump as a “racial arsonist” and assails him as indecent. I’m not going to exert a great deal of effort contesting any of that, but I have my doubts about Walsh’s political analysis, i.e. his argument in today’s New York Times that President Trump is vulnerable to a primary challenge from the right on grounds of fiscal responsibility.

Set aside, for the moment, what you actually think about Trump’s approach to race or his basic human decency and such, and only ask yourself this: If you sincerely believed President Trump to be a “racial arsonist,” that he is fundamentally indecent, that he is habitually dishonest, that he is morally and intellectually unfit for the office he holds, etc., then what on God’s green Earth would cause you to let all that slide only to draw the line at his unwillingness to take on entitlement reform — a project that nobody on either side of the political fence actually seems to want? (And that’s what fiscal rebalancing ultimately means: entitlement reform. We aren’t spending all those metaphorical and probably literal tons of money on art subsidies.) I do not remember Representative Joe Walsh (R., Ill.) going to the wall on real-world entitlement reform. (I do remember his support of the balanced-budget amendment, which is the Republican version of promising to mine asteroids to fund fully automated luxury gay space Communism.) When President George W. Bush got serious about entitlement reform for about five minutes, Republicans were walking sideways away from him as fast as their furry little rat feet could scurry.

I’ll believe that Republicans are serious about fiscal reform when a trillion-dollar deficit scares them more than does a strongly worded email from my friend Grover Norquist. As things stand right now, it’s — Advantage: Grover.

(For the record: It is true that I welcomed Bill Weld’s kamikaze entry into the 2020 race. I disagree with Weld on a great many things, but he makes me laugh, and if you’re an Eisenhower man looking at a protest vote, why not the guy whose picture appears next to the dictionary entry for “Country-Club Republican”?)

Walsh has gone one way since 2016, and the Republican party has gone another. There were a lot of heaving sighs and melancholy little gestures of resignation in 2016 — “It’s Trump or the commies!” they told us. A lot of people seemed to think that the word “binary” offered a smart-sounding way out of that. That was then. But unless I grievously misread the mood of Republicans, that’s not really the case anymore. The Republican party has embraced not only Trump but also Trumpism. It is his party now. There is not likely to be any challenge to Trump from the right because the Right is, by all indicators, satisfied with him.

For now, anyway.

There’s a scene in Oliver Stone’s Nixon (which is the greatest film yet made about American politics, as long as you don’t fall into the error of thinking that it is actually about Richard Nixon and his times) in which some right-wing Texas oilmen try to bully Nixon into taking a more hardline position. Nixon, who can do a little math, brushes them off: “What are you going to do? Vote for Hubert Humphrey?” That worked for Republicans in 2016. It probably will work for them in 2020, too. But there are people for whom “conservatism” means something other than late-night Kulturkampf on Twitter, who believe in limited government, free trade, the Bill of Rights, the rule of law, fiscal sobriety, the irreplaceable leadership of the United States in the international order, etc. Inertia isn’t going to keep them in the Republican party forever.

And not all of them are media figures with born-again plot lines to sell.

Most Popular

White House

More Evidence the Guardrails Are Gone

At the end of last month, just as the news of the Ukraine scandal started dominating the news cycle, I argued that we're seeing evidence that the guardrails that staff had placed around Donald Trump's worst instincts were in the process of breaking down. When Trump's staff was at its best, it was possible to draw ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Elizabeth Warren Is Not Honest

If you want to run for office, political consultants will hammer away at one point: Tell stories. People respond to stories. We’ve been a story-telling species since our fur-clad ancestors gathered around campfires. Don’t cite statistics. No one can remember statistics. Make it human. Make it relatable. ... Read More
National Review


Today is my last day at National Review. It's an incredibly bittersweet moment. While I've only worked full-time since May, 2015, I've contributed posts and pieces for over fifteen years. NR was the first national platform to publish my work, and now -- thousands of posts and more than a million words later -- I ... Read More
Economy & Business

Andrew Yang, Snake Oil Salesman

Andrew Yang, the tech entrepreneur and gadfly, has definitely cleared the bar for a successful cause candidate. Not only has he exceeded expectations for his polling and fundraising, not only has he developed a cult following, not only has he got people talking about his signature idea, the universal basic ... Read More

Is America Becoming Sinicized?

A little over 40 years ago, Chinese Communist strongman and reformer Deng Xiaoping began 15 years of sweeping economic reforms. They were designed to end the disastrous, even murderous planned economy of Mao Zedong, who died in 1976. The results of Deng’s revolution astonished the world. In four decades, ... Read More