The Corner


More Brexit Shenanigans

The Speaker of the House of Commons is required to be impartial. But the recent behavior of Speaker John Bercow in accepting an amendment that could change the course of Brexit has been met with accusations of anti-Brexit bias and constitutional wreckage.

On Tuesday evening, a week before members of parliament will vote on whether to go ahead with Prime Minister Theresa May’s controversial Withdrawal Agreement, the Commons voted against it in the government by introducing a finance bill which will limit the treasury’s spending power. This could spark a government shutdown, similar to the U.S., should the prime minister continue toward a “no deal” Brexit. Though ostensibly minor, many Brexiteers felt that this was a reckless action capable of causing unnecessary damage to the economy in the event of “no deal.” Certainly, it makes “no deal” less appealing.

But that, of course, was the precise point. That and confiscating the government’s control over Brexit in order to hand it back to parliament. Further proof of this anti-Brexit agenda came on Wednesday after the speaker proactively added an amendment to the motion, against the advice of the clerk. The amendment, proposed by the anti-Brexit former attorney general Dominic Grieve, limits the Prime Minister’s time to come up with an alternative plan should her deal be voted down. Again, this would effectively block a default “no deal” Brexit.

The Prime Minister used to say, quite rightly, that “no deal is better than a bad deal,” But in one fell swoop, Speaker Bercow has undone decades of parliamentary precedent and severely limited the government’s control over Brexit. Did he do so in the interest of Brexit or in the interest of those MPs who want to remain in the EU?

Madeleine Kearns — Madeleine Kearns is a William F. Buckley Fellow in Political Journalism at the National Review Institute. She is from Glasgow, Scotland, and is a trained singer.

Most Popular


In Defense of the Electoral College

Senator Elizabeth Warren has joined a growing chorus within the Democratic party in calling for the abolition of the Electoral College. Speaking at a forum in Mississippi on Monday night, Warren said that she hoped to ensure that “every vote matters” and proposed that “the way we can make that happen is ... Read More

Stick a Fork in O’Rourke

If, as I wrote last week here, Joe Biden may save the Democratic party from a horrible debacle at the polls next year, Beto O’Rourke may be doing the whole process a good turn now. Biden, despite his efforts to masquerade as the vanguard of what is now called progressivism, is politically sane and, if ... Read More
National Security & Defense

In Defense of the Iraq War

Today is the 16th anniversary of the invasion of Iraq, and Twitter is alive with condemnations of the conflict -- countered by precious few defenses. Yet I believed the Iraq War was just and proper in 2003, and I still believe that today. When Donald Trump condemned the war during the 2015 primary campaign and ... Read More

Beto-mania and Our Cult of Personality Politics

Robert “Beto” O’Rourke’s biggest fans and supporters insist he is a forward-thinking, future-oriented visionary, but no contender for the Democratic nomination feels more familiar than the former three-term congressman from El Paso. That’s because he has the highest combined score in both déjà vu ... Read More