The Corner

Kerry to Iran: Trust Us

The Iranian nuclear deal is based on verification, not trust, the Obama administration has repeatedly declared, yet its own words also point to another dynamic at play: its eagerness to persuade the Iranians that they, in fact, can trust the United States.

Of course, authentic trust is mutual. And so, at a hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Iran last Thursday, Secretary of State John Kerry — minutes after declaring, once again, the centrality of verification in the deal — offered a little-noticed declaration of trust in the regime.

Asked by Senator Rand Paul (R., Ky.) to respond to a recent statement by Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, that the agreement would not stop Iran’s nuclear program, Kerry advanced a defense of the Iranian dictator notable for its astoundingly tortured logic:

KERRY: And do you know why he’s saying that? Because he doesn’t believe the Americans stopped them, he believes he stopped them because he issued a fatwa, and he has declared the policy of their country is not to do it. So he is, as a matter of sovereignty and pride, making a true statement. He doesn’t believe the Americans stopped them. He said they didn’t want to get one in the first place.

In other words, Iran already stopped its nuclear program; hence the nuclear deal stops nothing.

Of course, throughout the negotiations, Secretary Kerry as well as President Obama had routinely quoted the supreme leader’s multiple pronouncements that Iran seeks no nuclear weapons.

But Kerry goes further here, offering a tautology that fully embraces Khamenei’s denial of his nuclear ambitions. In this sense, it’s not surprising that the secretary of state believes the agreement will prevent Iran from acquiring the bomb. His own words suggest that he trusts the supreme leader.

As such, Kerry can now turn his attention elsewhere, to persuading Iran that it can trust us. And of course, the chief obstacle to that goal lies in the prospect that Congress will reject the deal — an outcome, he said during the hearing, that would prove “we’re not trustworthy.”

Put differently, Kerry believes that Iranian trust of the United States remains indispensable for the deal — but not the reverse.

Kerry’s unfortunate comments would matter little if, in fact, the deal contained the sort of intrusive verification measures that would make it impossible for Iran to cheat. The absence of these provisions suggests that the secretary of state should worry more about our ability to trust Tehran than Tehran’s willingness to trust us.

Tzvi Kahn is a senior Iran analyst at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a Washington-based nonpartisan research institute focusing on national security and foreign policy.

Most Popular

Elections

Trouble in the Workers’ Paradise

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is precisely the sort of campaign surrogate you want, especially if you are Bernie Sanders: She is young, energetic, charismatic, popular (with the people she needs to be popular with, anyway), and, happily, currently ineligible to run for the presidency ... Read More
Elections

Trouble in the Workers’ Paradise

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is precisely the sort of campaign surrogate you want, especially if you are Bernie Sanders: She is young, energetic, charismatic, popular (with the people she needs to be popular with, anyway), and, happily, currently ineligible to run for the presidency ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Bill Barr Derangement Syndrome

Can the republic survive Attorney General William Barr? That’s the question that has seized the media and center-left, which have worked themselves into a full-blown panic over an attorney general who is, inarguably, a serious legal figure and one of the adults in the room late in President Trump’s first ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Bill Barr Derangement Syndrome

Can the republic survive Attorney General William Barr? That’s the question that has seized the media and center-left, which have worked themselves into a full-blown panic over an attorney general who is, inarguably, a serious legal figure and one of the adults in the room late in President Trump’s first ... Read More
Law & the Courts

The Roger Stone Double Standard

Whether Roger Stone, the loopy, self-aggrandizing political operative, deserves nine years in Supermax for obstructing an investigation into Russia–Donald Trump “collusion” is debatable. Whether the powerful men who helped create the investigation that ensnared Stone have been allowed to lie with impunity ... Read More
Law & the Courts

The Roger Stone Double Standard

Whether Roger Stone, the loopy, self-aggrandizing political operative, deserves nine years in Supermax for obstructing an investigation into Russia–Donald Trump “collusion” is debatable. Whether the powerful men who helped create the investigation that ensnared Stone have been allowed to lie with impunity ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Return of Conservative Economics

Today we are announcing the formation of American Compass, an organization dedicated to helping American conservatism recover from its chronic case of market fundamentalism. In preparation, we have been perusing the mission statements of many of our nation’s think tanks. Nearly every group has one. Oddly, the ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Return of Conservative Economics

Today we are announcing the formation of American Compass, an organization dedicated to helping American conservatism recover from its chronic case of market fundamentalism. In preparation, we have been perusing the mission statements of many of our nation’s think tanks. Nearly every group has one. Oddly, the ... Read More