https://youtube.com/watch?v=xqv7SIFAOn8
Looking at the recording of Donald Trump demeaning women compared to the secret Hillary Clinton speeches to Goldman Sachs, Bret Baier asked which would be worse, and Charles Krauthammer said that they are notably similar:
That’s a little bit hard to judge, we also haven’t had a chance to go through all the transcripts of what Hillary said. But based on a very small sample, there is some devastating ammunition there — particularly open borders and open trade.
These are going to be in Trump ads and Republican ads within days. But here is what’s interesting about this. None of this is surprising; if someone had asked you about Trump, “Do you think he talks like this in private?” You would answer, of course, “Yes.” But it’s hearing it; this is what video/audio evidence does. Once you hear it, it becomes information of a different order. The same with Hillary: Everybody knows that on every issue she has a private position and a public, and if they intersect, that’s nice, but if it doesn’t, that’s the way she operates. But when you hear her say it in a speech in public, it becomes evidence.
So I think what this is going to do is increase the negatives on both of them. It’s going to make it without a doubt an election between the two most increasingly unpopular candidates ever. These are of a different order: with her it is about policy and with him it is about temperament and attitude towards women. And I don’t think either of them is defensible in any way, it’s a question of how skillfully the opponent is going to be able to actually use it against them.