The Corner

Krauthammer’s Take: Nothing Trump Says ‘Can Ever Be Used Against Him’

Tonight Charles Krauthammer expressed bewilderment at Donald Trump’s ability to contradict himself without consequence, and praised Ted Cruz for avoiding a last-minute conversion on ethanol.

“I think the last six months have shown that nothing that Trump has ever said in the past, even in the present, can ever be used against him,” Krauthammer said on Wednesday’s Special Report. “Because for some reason, he is immune to the laws of contradiction. To take a trivial example, in the last debate he said, ‘I promise Ted’ — he brought up of course the Canadian citizenship — he said, ‘I’m protecting you against what the Democrats will do, I promise’ — he used the word ‘promise’ — ‘I will never sue over this.’ And then what, three days later at a rally, he said, ‘I might just sue.’”

“I mean those laws don’t apply,” Krauthammer continued. “I do give Cruz credit for sticking to his guns. On ethanol. Just about every candidate ever has caved or trimmed or shifted on ethanol.”

But he also warned Cruz’s opposition to ethanol subsidies will hurt his chances in Iowa:

But I do think actually it’s going to hurt him. It cost him the support of the longest-serving governor in the country who is rather popular in Iowa, who specifically singled him out, that Republicans should oppose him. But and I do think there this is where he’s got to make his stand in Iowa. Because if he doesn’t win in Iowa, I think it will be a real damaging blow.

Members of the National Review editorial and operational teams are included under the umbrella “NR Staff.”

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Judge Barrett on the Second Amendment

Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s impressive dissent in Kanter v. Barr (pp. 27-64) illustrates both her fidelity to the Supreme Court’s landmark Second Amendment ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and her masterful application of the constitutional methodology of originalism. Rickey I. Kanter pleaded ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Judge Barrett on the Second Amendment

Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s impressive dissent in Kanter v. Barr (pp. 27-64) illustrates both her fidelity to the Supreme Court’s landmark Second Amendment ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and her masterful application of the constitutional methodology of originalism. Rickey I. Kanter pleaded ... Read More
Law & the Courts

On Judge Barrett, Let’s Tell the Truth

Once when I was a kid, my dad held up three fingers and asked, “Does this two look like a three?” Little did I know that this attempted sleight of hand would become a regular feature of the process for appointing federal judges. Watch for it in the days ahead as the Senate considers President Donald Trump’s ... Read More
Law & the Courts

On Judge Barrett, Let’s Tell the Truth

Once when I was a kid, my dad held up three fingers and asked, “Does this two look like a three?” Little did I know that this attempted sleight of hand would become a regular feature of the process for appointing federal judges. Watch for it in the days ahead as the Senate considers President Donald Trump’s ... Read More
Law & the Courts

The Judicial Branch Ragnarök Is Upon Us

As expected, President Trump selected Amy Coney Barrett as his third nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court, and now the Judicial Branch Ragnarök and Related Festival of Catholic-Bashing is upon us. Senate Democrats could argue that based upon Barrett’s past decisions, they don’t agree with her legal ... Read More
Law & the Courts

The Judicial Branch Ragnarök Is Upon Us

As expected, President Trump selected Amy Coney Barrett as his third nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court, and now the Judicial Branch Ragnarök and Related Festival of Catholic-Bashing is upon us. Senate Democrats could argue that based upon Barrett’s past decisions, they don’t agree with her legal ... Read More