The Corner

Krauthammer’s Take

From Monday night’s Fox News All-Stars

On Sharon Bialek’s allegations of sexual misconduct against Herman Cain:

Well, the presence of Gloria Allred doesn’t help anyone’s case. Nonetheless, this is a very serious charge. It’s not sexual harassment. She wasn’t an employee at the time. If true, it’s a kind of sexual assault, which is an order of magnitude worse.

Now, to be lawyerly about it, the corroboration is not quite as [strong] as presented. There are affidavits of people who said she spoke to them at the time. But she said she was too embarrassed to give any details. So she probably spoke about some kind of inappropriate behavior, which could have been anything.

So, we only have her word on the actual details of what occurred — her word against his word. This is a classic case: There are no witnesses. And there’s no way to adjudicate between them.

The problem for Cain is it [this accusation] comes on top of several other accusations. And it also involves a woman who appears to have no motive other than coming out and telling what she thought had happened. There may be one [motive], but it’s not obvious. I think for Cain, this is going to be something that he may not be able to actually shake.

On a recent Washington Post-ABC News poll in which only 20 percent of Republican respondents said that a nominee’s electability is more important than his or her conformity with their views:

I think that 20 percent will grow as Election Day approaches and as people really have to decide whether they want to take a risk.

Michelle Bachmann is the one who put it best: we don’t have to settle this time, meaning, we can go for ideological purity. We don’t have to settle for a Romney – that’s the obvious implication. But she also said in the debate, the outcome of this election is baked in cake: Obama is a one-term president.

That is an assumption that is entirely unwarranted. Obama could very well win the election. If you assume it’s a lost election [for Obama], of course you want the most ideologically congenial candidate. If you don’t assume that (and you shouldn’t) then you want to think about — as a conservative, as a Republican — what is the cost of making a miscalculation and having a second Obama term?

On the chances of the Supercommittee reaching an agreement:

I was optimistic at the beginning because I thought this would be one chance to do tax reform, and there you can get the liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, to agree. It happened in 1986 and everybody is happy. But it looks as if it is not going to happen.

I think the main reason is this: Barack Obama has decided in the interim — it began with the speech he gave to joint session of Congress — that the only way he can run is to end… actually doing some governance and run full- time as a candidate…

We are now in the full campaign mode. With nine percent unemployment, he has only one choice. He needs a foil, a do-nothing Congress, and he has to make sure it does nothing….

Democrats are insisting on tax hikes, a hike in tax rates — not just revenue, which Republicans would accept if you eliminate loopholes — a hike in tax rates, which he knows Republican will not accept. So it ends up in deadlock. And then he has a foil….

NRO Staff — Members of the National Review Online editorial and operational teams are included under the umbrella “NR Staff.”

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Fox News Anchor Shepard Smith Resigns

Fox News Channel's chief anchor, Shepard Smith, announced on air Friday that he would be resigning from his post after 23 years with the network. “This is my last newscast here,” said Smith. “Recently, I asked the company to allow me to leave Fox News. After requesting that I stay, they obliged.” He ... Read More
NR Webathon

Don’t Let Michael Mann Succeed

I  enjoyed the running joke of Jarndyce v. Jarndyce in the great Dickens novel Bleak House, back when I first read it. Little did I know that one day I and the magazine that I love would effectively be caught up in a version of that interminable case, courtesy of a litigious climate scientist with zero regard ... Read More
White House

What Is Impeachment For?

W hat is impeachment for? Seems like a simple question. Constitutionally speaking, it also appears to have a simple answer: to cite and remove from power a president guilty of wrongdoing. Aye, there’s the rub. What sort of wrongdoing warrants removal from power? I’d wager that the flames of ... Read More

Beto Proposes to Oppress Church with State

Beto O’Rourke’s presidential campaign is within the margin of error of non-existence, but in his failure he has found a purpose: expressing the Democratic id. His latest bid for left-wing love came at a CNN forum on gay rights, where he said that churches that oppose same-sex marriage should have to pay ... Read More