The Corner

La. Democrats Come to Scalise’s Defense: He’s No Racist

It’s been pile-on time this week against House Majority Whip Steve Scalise of Louisiana, who has been scrambling to explain if and why he might have spoken to a white-nationalist group as a state legislator back in 2002. Scalise claims he can’t recall speaking at the EURO conference near his Metairie district, and he says that with a staff of one at the time he didn’t vet all the groups he spoke to promoting his opposition to tax increases. The EURO conference featured former KKK leader David Duke as a speaker by video link from Europe.

But not every Democrat or liberal has turned the controversy into a political cudgel. Representative Cedric Richmond of New Orleans, the only Democrat in Louisiana’s U.S. House delegation, told the Times-Picayune, “I don’t think Steve Scalise has a racist bone in his body. Steve and I have worked on issues that benefit poor people, black people, white people, Jewish people. I know his character.” He then launched a riposte against Scalise’s critics, implying that their comments were more political than substantive. “I am not going to let them use Steve as a scapegoat to score political points when I know him and know his family,” Richmond told the paper.

State senator Edwin Murray, a Democrat who also represents New Orleans, followed up with his own comment on Twitter about his state legislative colleague: “[Scalise has] always been honest, fair and respectful of others.” Other Democrats, including former U.S. senator Bennett Johnston, say it is going too far to expect Scalise to have known about EURO. “I know a lot about David Duke, who ran against me for the Senate in 1990, but I never knew that the ‘EURO’was a racist organization,” Johnston said in a statement. “I may disagree with Representative Scalise but a racist he is not. Nor would he have been stupid enough to knowingly address a racist group.”

The Scalise scandal, and the ham-handed way in which he and other members of the GOP leadership have dealt with it, was designed to throw Republicans off their stride as they prepare to convene the first Congress under unified GOP control in a decade. In that, it has succeeded. But from now on, Republicans should refer reporters to those Louisiana Democrats who (a) know the situation best and (b) are increasingly vocal in their view that the issue has been overblown or exaggerated.

Most Popular


Angela Rye Knows You’re Racist

The political philosopher Michael Oakeshott said that the “rationalist” is hopelessly lost in ideology, captivated by the world of self-contained coherence he has woven from strands of human experience. He concocts a narrative about narratives, a story about stories, and adheres to the “large outline which ... Read More

What the Viral Border-Patrol Video Leaves Out

In an attempt to justify Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s absurd comparison of American detention facilities to Holocaust-era concentration camps, many figures within the media have shared a viral video clip of a legal hearing in which a Department of Justice attorney debates a panel of judges as to what constitutes ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Pro-Abortion Nonsense from John Irving

The novelist has put up a lot of easy targets in his New York Times op-ed. I am going to take aim at six of his points, starting with his strongest one. First: Irving asserts that abortion was legal in our country from Puritan times until the 1840s, at least before “quickening.” That’s an overstatement. ... Read More
Film & TV

Murder Mystery: An Old Comedy Genre Gets Polished Up

I  like Adam Sandler, and yet you may share the sense of trepidation I get when I see that another of his movies is out. He made some very funny manboy comedies (Billy Madison, Happy Gilmore, The Waterboy) followed by some not-so-funny manboy comedies, and when he went dark, in Reign over Me and Funny People, ... Read More