Today’s NYT editorial on the tobacco regulation bill is interesting. The Times claims the bill is an “enormous victory for public health,” yet cites estimates that it will only reduce youth andadult smoking by 11 and 2 percent over the next decade. That doesn’t sound like much. Further, the editorial reports the bill “might not have passed without the decision by Philip Morris, the industry leader, to accept regulation. The company apparently believes it can thrive better under regulation than its competitors, who complain that it will now be much harder for them to introduce new products to challenge Philip Morris’s dominance.” Hmmm. Could there be a connection? Consider further that one likely effect of the legislation is to make it more difficult to market tobacco-based alternatives to cigarettes, such as “Snus” or various forms of smokeless tobacco, that are a less deadly way for smokers to obtain their nicotine fix. This certainly benefits incumbent firms, like Philip Morris, and could actually harm public health. Another provision of the bill will empower the FDA to reduce the nicotine content of cigarettes. Yet insofar as many smokers smoke for the nicotine, this could mean that some will smoke more cigarettes to satisfy the same habit. And this will be good for public health how? The more one looks at this bill, the less it seems like a genuine “public health” measure — and yet it will still give the federal government tremendous new regulatory control over a legal industry. Like so much these days, the bill represents the marriage of big government and big business, and there’s little left for the little guy.
Recommended

Biden Signs Executive Order Allowing the U.S. to Fund Global Abortions
The policy was first instated by President Reagan to ensure that taxpayers would not be required to indirectly fund abortions in other countries.

Exclusive: 48 Senators Promise to Oppose Any Bill that Funds Abortion
Pro-life lawmakers pledge to resist spending bills that don’t include the Hyde amendment.

The Absurd Criticism of Rand Paul’s Rachel Levine Questioning
How likely is it that this dangerous ideological agenda is about to get worse?

Cruz: Actually, It Is Constitutional to Impeach and Convict a Former President
Never mind how he voted.

What Happened to Officer Sicknick?
Democratic impeachment managers have a duty to explain how Officer Sicknick died.

Minnesota Nasty
Minneapolis is a nice city no longer.
The Latest

AOC Calls for Investigation into ‘Extraordinarily Serious’ Cuomo Sexual-Harassment Allegations
Lindsey Boylan, a former staffer for the N.Y. governor, recently published an essay detailing the alleged harassment, including unwanted touching and kissing.

Biden: Illegal Immigrants Should Be Able to Get Vaccine without Fear of ICE
The Department of Homeland Security announced earlier this month that ICE would not conduct enforcement activities at or near vaccination sites.

GameStop: Markets Adjust, Politicians Frown
The week of February 22: GameStop, again, a poor choice for Interior, China’s rare-earths play, and much, much more.

House Narrowly Passes Massive COVID-Response Bill, Including $15 Minimum Wage
The bill passed largely along party lines.

What Makes the Classics Worth Studying
One classical scholar believes that the field is too implicated in ‘whiteness’ to survive as-is. Here’s why he’s wrong.

Garland Heralds Return of the Obama Justice Department — Radical as Ever
Two highly troubling DOJ nominees are likely to roll over Garland just like the woke Left is rolling over Biden.