The Corner

Lerner Cautioned IRS Employees about Use of E-mail

E-mails released Wednesday by the House Oversight Committee show that disgraced Internal Revenue Service official Lois Lerner warned her colleagues about communicating via e-mail when Congress began investigating the agency’s targeting of right-leaning groups.

Oversight Committee chairman Darrell Issa, a California Republican, called the e-mails the “smoking gun” in the IRS scandal, which his committee has been investigating for over a year.

“[This is] a smoking gun, this is Lois Lerner clearly cautioning people not to say things on email and be delighted to find out that the local instant chat they have, this Microsoft product, wasn’t tracking what they said,” Issa said Wednesday in an interview with Fox News.

In the April 2013 e-mail exchange, Lerner tells another IRS employee as well as the manager of the Exempt Organizations division, Nanette Downing, that she is “cautioning folks about email” because “Congress has asked for emails and there has been an electronic search for responsive emails — so we need to be cautious about what we say in emails.”

The release of the e-mail exchange will fuel the continuing controversy over the records of Lerner’s communications. The IRS has said it cannot produce many of the e-mails she sent during a two-year period as a result of a hard-drive crash on her computer, and Lerner’s vocal concern about the contents of e-mail messages adds heft to Republicans’ charge that vital evidence has been lost.

Lerner, who retired from the IRS last September after she was suspended due to her role in the targeting of conservative groups, went on to ask whether “OCS conversations” — conversations conducted over the IRS’s electronic instant-messaging system — would be turned over to congressional investigators in addition to e-mails.

Issa said the exchange makes it clear that Lerner was “covering her tracks” and “didn’t want an audit trail of what they’d been doing and what they were doing was targeting conservatives for their views.”

The timing of Lerner’s message is significant because it was just a month later, in May 2013, that she disclosed the IRS’s inappropriate targeting of conservative groups by planting a question in the audience at a conference of the American Bar Association in Washington, D.C. At the time, she knew that the Treasury Department inspector general was investigating the targeting scandal at the urging of House Republicans, who had for months been asking questions about the complaints they were receiving from tea-party groups about seemingly invasive inquiries from the IRS.

Most Popular

A Few Cracks in the Progressive Wall

The contemporary progressive agenda — of, say, an Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, or Elizabeth Warren — has rarely appealed to 51 percent of the American electorate. Most polls show opposition to Court packing and the abolition of the Electoral College. Voters don’t seem to like ... Read More

A Few Cracks in the Progressive Wall

The contemporary progressive agenda — of, say, an Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, or Elizabeth Warren — has rarely appealed to 51 percent of the American electorate. Most polls show opposition to Court packing and the abolition of the Electoral College. Voters don’t seem to like ... Read More
Elections

Biden Is Still Underperforming Hillary

On October 20, 2016: Hillary Clinton was up 6.8 in the RealClearPolitics average in Pennsylvania. Today, Biden is up 3.8. (that race only tightened to 2.1 in the last week of 2016.) Clinton was up twelve points in Michigan on that day. Biden is up 7.5 right now. Clinton was up 6.5 in Wisconsin. Biden is ... Read More
Elections

Biden Is Still Underperforming Hillary

On October 20, 2016: Hillary Clinton was up 6.8 in the RealClearPolitics average in Pennsylvania. Today, Biden is up 3.8. (that race only tightened to 2.1 in the last week of 2016.) Clinton was up twelve points in Michigan on that day. Biden is up 7.5 right now. Clinton was up 6.5 in Wisconsin. Biden is ... Read More

Trump: No

Editor’s Note: The following is one of three essays, each from a different perspective, in the latest edition of National Review on the question of whether to vote for President Trump. The views below reflect those of the individual author, not of the NR editorial board as a whole. The other two essays can be ... Read More

Trump: No

Editor’s Note: The following is one of three essays, each from a different perspective, in the latest edition of National Review on the question of whether to vote for President Trump. The views below reflect those of the individual author, not of the NR editorial board as a whole. The other two essays can be ... Read More

Trump: Yes

Editor’s Note: The following is one of three essays, each from a different perspective, in the latest edition of National Review on the question of whether to vote for President Trump. The views below reflect those of the individual author, not of the NR editorial board as a whole. The other two essays can be ... Read More

Trump: Yes

Editor’s Note: The following is one of three essays, each from a different perspective, in the latest edition of National Review on the question of whether to vote for President Trump. The views below reflect those of the individual author, not of the NR editorial board as a whole. The other two essays can be ... Read More
Elections

Why Hunter?

Hunter Biden, Joe’s younger son, has become a fixture of the 2020 race. Since August 27, 2019, Donald Trump has tweeted about Hunter 59 separate times, making his colorful past one of the Trump campaign’s most important attacks on his rival. For many years, Hunter struggled with serious drug and alcohol ... Read More
Elections

Why Hunter?

Hunter Biden, Joe’s younger son, has become a fixture of the 2020 race. Since August 27, 2019, Donald Trump has tweeted about Hunter 59 separate times, making his colorful past one of the Trump campaign’s most important attacks on his rival. For many years, Hunter struggled with serious drug and alcohol ... Read More