The Corner

“The Lessons of 2006”

According to Fred Siegel, they’re that Republicans need to go left on social issues–because “swing voters and GOP moderates deserted them in droves” in those elections. Pretty much every group of voters aside from self-identified conservatives turned against Republicans last year. But it’s not at all clear that social issues drove the trend. I would say that the three biggest factors that hurt the GOP were 1) that we were losing a war and Republicans didn’t seem to want to acknowledge it, let alone change the policy; 2) a lot of Republicans were caught up in corruption scandals; and 3) Republicans seemed to be (and were) more interested in holding on to power than doing anything for the country–which was related to (1) and (2).

The pattern of candidate and referenda victories in 2006 does not corroborate Siegel’s thesis. (E.g., Nancy Johnson didn’t lose in Connecticut because she was too beholden to the religious Right.) Neither does the actual conduct of the campaign, in which Democrats generally played down social issues.

Ramesh Ponnuru — Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

Elections

Yes, Voter Fraud Is Real

M aybe ballot security isn’t such a bad thing after all. Democrats, who the day before yesterday were insisting that voter fraud didn’t exist, now believe that it was used to steal a North Carolina congressional seat from them — and they may well be right. Republican Mark Harris has a 905-vote lead ... Read More