The Corner

Let’s Not Rely on Russia to Ferry Our Astronauts

According to an Agence France-Presse report yesterday, Russia’s Deputy PM warned that new anti-Russia, anti-invasion sanctions amounted to the U.S. “exposing their astronauts on the ISS” — the International Space Station. Russia ferries American astronauts to and from the ISS, and in case of an emergency, a Russian capsule is the station’s escape pod. Russia provides these useful services in exchange for $65 million per astronaut. That price is about to go up: Starting in 2016, the U.S. will pay $424 million for six rides to space. Evidently that isn’t enough for senior Russian officials to refrain from threatening (if “threatening” is the right word) our men in space (two of them are up there now). American alternatives to the Russian ferry service are scheduled to begin flying in 2017. I proposed sanctioning Russia by taking our $424 million and spending it domestically, in an effort to push our return to manned spaceflight up a year, to 2016 — when the new ferry contract would begin. A week after the piece ran, NASA administrator Charles Bolden agreed that it was possible: “We could potentially accelerate [American manned flights] by a year if we’re given adequate funding.”

The funding in question is a $150 million increase from NASA’s last allowance, but $424 million would be better. Especially now that we’re “exposing” our astronauts on the ISS.

Josh Gelernter — Josh Gelernter is a former columnist for NRO, and a frequent contributor to The Weekly Standard.

Most Popular


How to Bend the News

This, from ABC, is a nice example of a news organization deliberately bending the truth in order to advance a narrative that it wishes were true but is not: Venerable gun manufacturer Colt says it will stop producing the AR-15, among other rifles, for the consumer market in the wake of many recent mass ... Read More

Story Time with David Brooks

His latest column imagines a future in which Elizabeth Warren wins the next presidential election. Warren won convincingly. The Democrats built a bigger majority in the House, and to general surprise, won a slim Senate majority of 52 to 48. After that election, the Republicans suffered a long, steady decline. ... Read More