The Corner

Libby Detention Ruling

Unfortunately, as is usually the case with Libby coverage, it’s all passion and no substance.

To read what’s being reported, one would think:  “It’s just a simple matter of being reasonable.  Scooter has a right to appeal.  And if he wins the appeal, he might not have to do any time.  So why not just hold the detention off until the appeal is decided in a year or so.”

Sounds totally reasonable.  And it’s also totally wrong. 

With lots of support from conservatives, Congress several years ago was determined to make sure convicted felons were taken off the street.  (Based on similar concerns that weak liberal judges were not cracking down hard enough on crooks, law-and-order conservatives similarly supported the very same draconian sentencing guidelines that resulted in Libby’s 30-month sentence.)  Basically, congress — with broad public support — has removed judicial discretion because we no longer trust judges to be judges. 

I hate this new system (which came into being in 1984 and has gotten worse since).  Yes, judges occasionally make outrageous rulings (those are the small percentage of rulings we hear about).  But, most of the time, left to their own judgment, they act pretty reasonably.  Our statutes, however, no longer leave them to their own judgment.  We’re noticing that today — although we are blaming Walton rather than the statutes; and, if we were honest with ourselves, we know we’d be furious if we learned that a judge imperiously ignored the controlling statute in a typical case not involving someone we know and like.

Whether a convicted defendant is entitled to bail pending appeal is controlled by Section 3143 of Title 18, U.S. Code.  The statute contains a clear presumption that a convicted defendant who has received a jail sentence will be incarcerated pending appeal (“the judicial officer shall order that a person who has been found guilty of an offense and sentenced to a term of imprisonment, and who has filed an appeal … be detained”) (emphasis added).  The presumption in favor of incarceration may be overcome, as relevant in this case, only if the judge finds that “the appeal … raises a substantial question of law or fact likely to result in (i) reversal, (ii) an order for a new trial, (iii) a sentence that does not include a term of imprisonment, or (iv) [a reduced sentence that would amount to less than the time it will take to prosecute the appeal]“ (emphasis added).

Applying that statute, Judge Walton was required to deny bail pending appeal unless he thought Scooter’s appeal was likely to succeed.  But, of course, if he thought there had been an error grievous enough to warrant reversal, he wouldn’t have sentenced Scooter in the first place — he’d have set aside the jury verdict on his own and either acquitted him or ordered a new trial.

Today’s ruling was absolutely to be expected.  The judge was not going to make a ruling implicitly suggesting that the trial over which he presided was error-ridden. 

The interesting part starts now.  Now that Judge Walton has officially entered his judgment of conviction (which technically happens when sentence is imposed) jurisdiction will transfer to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.  Thus, in very short order, Libby will file an expedited appeal challenging the Judge Walton’s detention order on the ground that there are appellate issues on which he is likely to succeed.  If he wins, it gets interesting because the appellate court would be signalling that it perceives some problem with the trial or sentence.  If he loses, that will mean the denial of bail was no big deal because Libby’s appeal is virtually certain to fail anyway.

That’s where we’re at.  It’s not about Judge Walton being a reasonable or unreasonable guy.  It’s about what the law says.  I don’t like the law.  I doubt Scooter’s appeal will go anyplace, but I think the Republic would be just fine if he could avoid jail until his appeals are exhausted.  But that’s not the way our system works anymore.  I think it was better when we used to let judges be judges.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

The Sinking Collusion Ship

The entire Trump-Russia collusion narrative was always implausible. One, the Washington swamp of fixers such as Paul Manafort and John and Tony Podesta was mostly bipartisan and predated Trump. Two, the Trump administration’s Russia policies were far tougher on Vladimir Putin than were those of Barack ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Problem with Certainty

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Including those of you having this read to you while you white-knuckle the steering wheel trying to get to wherever you’re going for the ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Worst Cover-Up of All Time

President Donald Trump may be guilty of many things, but a cover-up in the Mueller probe isn’t one of them. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, attempting to appease forces in the Democratic party eager for impeachment, is accusing him of one, with all the familiar Watergate connotations. The charge is strange, ... Read More

Theresa May: A Political Obituary

On Friday, Theresa May, perhaps the worst Conservative prime minister in recent history, announced her resignation outside of number 10 Downing Street. She will step down effective June 7. “I have done my best,” she insisted. “I have done everything I can. . . . I believe it was right to persevere even ... Read More
PC Culture

TV Before PC

Affixing one’s glance to the rear-view mirror is usually as ill-advised as staring at one’s own reflection. Still, what a delight it was on Wednesday to see a fresh rendition of “Those Were the Days,” from All in the Family, a show I haven’t watched for nearly 40 years. This time it was Woody Harrelson ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Democrats’ Other Class War

There is a class war going on inside the Democratic party. Consider these two cris de couer: Writing in the New York Times under the headline “America’s Cities Are Unlivable — Blame Wealthy Liberals,” Farhad Manjoo argues that rich progressives have, through their political domination of cities such as ... Read More

The Deepfake of Nancy Pelosi

You’ve almost made it to a three-day weekend! Making the click-through worthwhile: A quick note about how National Review needs your help, concerns about “deepfakes” of Nancy Pelosi, one of the most cringe-inducing radio interviews of all time, some news about where to find me and the book in the near ... Read More

America’s Best Defense Against Socialism

The United States of America has flummoxed socialists since the nineteenth century. Marx himself couldn’t quite understand why the most advanced economy in the world stubbornly refused to transition to socialism. Marxist theory predicts the immiseration of the proletariat and subsequent revolution from below. ... Read More