The Corner

Libby & Obstruction

Ok, one last thought. Count 1 – Obstruction. What Fitzgerald said at his press conference was the reason he couldn’t prosecute the underlying crime of passing classifed information to reporters was because of Libby’s obstruction by lying. The more I think about this, the more illogical that is. The basic rationale of the indictment is that the grand jury found out he was supposedly lying, and now knows the truth. Fitzgerald could not have charged perjury and false statements had not other witnesses told him the truth. In other words, he got past Libby’s lies, and he didn’t have the evidence to charge Libby on the underlying offense. So, I believe this underscores my point, which I have been making from day one, that it was wholly inappropriate because Fitzgerald did not adhere to his own standard of only speaking to the charges that were entered, i.e., that Libby passed classified information. This was nothing more than his personal opinion. Of course, he can charge obstruction even if it fails, but he cannot rely upon the alleged obstruction in order to accuse someone of passing classified information without charging him.

Most Popular


The Metropolitan Museum of Art Defaces Its Façade

The facade of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, designed by Richard Morris Hunt in 1902, contains four large niches that might display sculpture but have traditionally been left empty. This was prudent good taste on the Met's part, since sculpture on buildings is a tricky business that few artists in our age of ... Read More

Story Time with David Brooks

His latest column imagines a future in which Elizabeth Warren wins the next presidential election. Warren won convincingly. The Democrats built a bigger majority in the House, and to general surprise, won a slim Senate majority of 52 to 48. After that election, the Republicans suffered a long, steady decline. ... Read More