Not that I disagree with any substantive point Peter Kirsanow makes in his Corner post yesterday afternoon — which is well worth reading — but he is wrong about the minor factual claim that the Little Sisters’ case is “the first time that Catholic nuns will have a case heard before the Supreme Court.” In 1925, the Supreme Court heard the case of Pierce v. Society of the Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary, who brought suit to stop the implementation of an Oregon statute compelling all parents in the state to send their children to public schools, effectively closing all private, including religious, primary and secondary schools in the state. (The Society of Sisters was joined by the secular Hill Military Academy.) They won their case with a unanimous judgment of the Supreme Court.
President Trump urged the president of Turkey in a phone call Monday not to "mistreat" Kurdish forces who have fought alongside U.S. troops against the Islamic State. “The President expressed the desire to work together to address Turkey’s security concerns in northeast Syria while stressing the importance ... Read More
On Monday, Gillette — the razor and shaving-cream company — joined the chorus of cultural forces decrying so-called “toxic masculinity.” The company ran an online commercial suggesting that the history of American masculinity is rife with sexual harassment, bullying, and cruelty — and that the new ... Read More
She's not holding back. Read More
The old anti-Semitism was mostly, but not exclusively, a tribal prejudice expressed in America up until the mid 20th century most intensely on the right. It manifested itself from the silk-stocking country club and corporation (“gentlemen’s agreement”) to the rawer regions of the Ku Klux Klan’s lunatic ... Read More
It’s déjà vu all over again. A federal judge has blocked a lawful Trump-administration policy, essentially enshrining the Obama administration’s policy choices in social-justice granite. The practical result is a judicial equivalent of a one-way ratchet. The pattern is clear: Step One: The Obama ... Read More
Democrats and others on the left offer three reasons for their opposition to building a wall on America's southern border. 1. A wall is ineffective. 2. A wall is too expensive. 3. A wall is immoral. Each one is false, so false as to constitute lies. So, the only question is: Do Democrats and others on ... Read More
Let’s begin with a series of difficult questions. What should the FBI do when it possesses information that causes trained counterintelligence officials to fear that the president of the United States is — either knowingly or unknowingly — falling under the influence of a hostile foreign power? Should the ... Read More