The Corner

The ‘Living Wage’ Stops Workers from Earning a Living

When I lived near Brixton in London in the 1990s, the Ritzy Cinema had a reputation for being very earnestly left-wing, showing the sort of documentaries that the class warriors who staffed the People’s Republic of Lambeth (and no-one else) flocked to see. By all accounts it hasn’t changed much, and its staff have recently made headlines calling for a “Living Wage” over and above the UK’s national minimum wage of about $10.50 an hour. Even Monty Python cast members supported the picket line set up during the live screening of their recent concert.

The Ritzy employees have gotten their way, and will now be paid $14.20 an hour. Well, some of them. The cinema’s management has announced there will be staff layoffs as a result, with about a fifth of the workforce losing their jobs.

Any serious student of the economics of the minimum wage could have predicted this. As it happens, I’ve just written a long-ish piece (along with my colleague Ryan Young) for the Washington Examiner on the effects of the minimum wage, with particular focus on what Bastiat would call the “unseen” effects. Job losses like those at the Ritzy are just the beginning. As we summarize:

Breaking out of poverty is difficult for many people, and the evidence is that a minimum wage adds to the difficulty. Workers are fired, hours are cut, jobs are not created, non-wage perks, including insurance, free parking, free meals, and vacation days evaporate, annual bonuses shrink, prices rise, (squeezing minimum wage earners themselves), big businesses gain an artificial competitive advantage over their smaller competitors, and crime rates rise. It is a bleak litany.

The minimum wage, and even more so a mandated “living wage,” hurts people they are supposed to help.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

It’s a Set-up

In my column yesterday, I contended that the unverifiable sexual-assault allegation against Judge Brett Kavanaugh bore “all the hallmarks of a set-up.” I based that assessment on the patently flimsy evidence, coupled with Senate Democrats’ duplicitous abuse of the confirmation-hearing process. To repeat ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Censure Dianne Feinstein

Regardless of the fate of Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination, the Senate should censure the ranking Democratic member of the Judiciary Committee, Dianne Feinstein. Her deception and maneuvering, condemned across the political spectrum, seriously interfered with the Senate’s performance of its constitutional duty to ... Read More

Are We on the Verge of Civil War?

Americans keep dividing into two hostile camps. It seems the country is back to 1860 on the eve of the Civil War, rather than in 2018, during the greatest age of affluence, leisure, and freedom in the history of civilization. The ancient historian Thucydides called the civil discord that tore apart the ... Read More