The Corner

Lois Lerner’s ‘Lost’ Emails

Eliana’s report is just stunning — no matter how many times similar “mishaps” have occurred in this administration. The IRS, like other government agencies, has lots of reasons to maintain e-mails, so I’m curious about whether they will be similarly informing courts, Congress, litigants, FOIA petitioners, and other people and bodies they must periodically make disclosures and reports to that they’ve lost nearly two years’ worth of agency communications? Or was this just one of those highly, highly unusual computer crashes that affects only the e-mail account of Lois Lerner and any executive branch official with whom she happened to exchange messages?

In Faithless Execution, I recount that it was especially important to the Framers that the president be accountable. After considering a variety of different models, they decided to vest all executive power in a single official — the president — not in a committee or an array of agencies. “The executive power is better to be trusted,” James Wilson explained, “when it has no screen.” The arrangement was supposed to make the president singularly responsible for the actions, including the wrongdoing, of any and all his subordinates.

Naturally, when it reluctantly covers administration scandals, Obama’s media Praetorian guard spins the story as being that the misconduct du jour of the IRS, the ATF, the Justice Department, the State Department, the VA, and the rest “has not been connected to the White House.” But it is always connected to the White House. The president is responsible for all the officials and agencies delegated to wield the power the Constitution vests only in him — and this is even more surely the case when his reaction to nearly every scandal is to protect or promote wayward officials and agencies; to help stonewall rather than encourage cooperation with investigators, get to the bottom of what happened, and discipline the incompetents and rogues. And while some Obama apologists say the executive branch has expanded too much for any one person reasonably to be held accountable for its actions, how could that be a defense for a president who claims government can efficiently handle a dramatically more intrusive role in our lives?

When will this president finally have to answer for the executive-branch lawlessness that is an everyday occurrence on his watch?

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Demagoguery Is Not Leadership

The government of Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern in New Zealand has, with the support of the opposition, decided to enact fundamental changes in the nation’s firearms laws less than a week after the massacre at two Christchurch mosques. This is the opposite of leadership. It is also an example of why ... Read More
White House

The Media’s Disgrace

There will soon enough be an effort to memory-hole it, but the media coverage of the Russia investigation was abysmal and self-discrediting — obsessive and hysterical, often suggesting that the smoking gun was right around the corner, sometimes supporting its hoped-for result with erroneous, too-good-to-check ... Read More

Political Theatrics

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Including all you whippersnappers under the age of 50), I’m writing this from somewhere over the Atlantic. At least I hope that’s ... Read More
Politics & Policy

What Was Trump So Annoyed About?

One of the stranger arguments that I heard throughout the Mueller saga -- and am hearing today, now that it's turned out to be a dud -- is that Donald Trump's irritation with the process was unreasonable and counterproductive. This tweet, from CNN's Chris Cilizza, is a nice illustration of the genre: Donald ... Read More