The Corner


Ramesh, while it is possible to raise the usual theoretical objections to almost any form of state monopoly, I think that it’s going too far to describe state lottery monopolies as ‘unfair’. Any damage to consumers from the lack of competition is likely to be negligible. The only people who seem to suffer are would-be lottery entrepreneurs. Again, theoretically, that may be an outrageous assault on the free market, but I doubt that it’s one that, practically speaking, matters too much. On the money-raising point, I suspect that government would just go ahead and find the cash from some other source. It always seems to – just ask Nurse Bloomberg. To the extent that state-sponsored lotteries reduce the need for additional state-sponsored taxes, that’s fine with me.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Basta La Vista, Baby

Dear Reader (And especially Martha McSally’s dog), As I often note, I increasingly tend to see the political scene as a scripted reality show in which the writers don’t flesh out the dialogue so much as move characters into weird, wacky, confrontational, or embarrassing positions. It’s a lot like The ... Read More

Betsy DeVos Strikes a Blow for the Constitution

The Department of Education has issued its long-awaited proposed regulations reforming sexual-assault adjudications on college campus. Not only will these rules restore basic due process and fairness to college tribunals, but they also — given how basic the changes are — highlight just how ridiculous ... Read More
Politics & Policy

ABC News Makes a Serious Mistake

Today, across Twitter, I began to see a number of people condemning the Trump administration (and Betsy DeVos, specifically) for imposing a new definition of sexual assault on campus so strict that it would force women to prove that they were so harassed that they'd been chased off campus and couldn't return. ... Read More