The Corner


A couple of readers wrote in to say that they’d gotten no-match letters, even though their number of employees was far below the current threshold set by the Social Security Administration. And a former Hill staffer reminded me that in 2002 SSA sent out huge numbers of no-match letters, eight times more than usual, in an effort to clean up its records. As the Washington Post described the effort in August of that year:

Since early this year, the Social Security Administration has sent letters to more than 800,000 businesses — about one in eight U.S. employers — asking them to clear up cases in which their workers’ names or Social Security numbers do not match the agency’s files. The letters cover about 7 million employees.

Agency officials say that they are simply trying to tackle a bookkeeping problem and that the action is not related to the new get-tough approach on immigration stemming from the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. But the result could be the most dramatic blow in years to undocumented workers on company payrolls.

Two-word translation of “the most dramatic blow in years to undocumented workers on company payrolls” — It worked! And that is precisely why the effort was discontinued.

Also from the 2002 Post story:

“The impact is enormous,” said Cecilia Munoz of the National Council of La Raza, which represents Hispanics. “We’re hearing about it from all over the country.”

Cecilia now works in the White House.

And even if Whitman was sent a no-match letter, and her illegal-alien maid actually gave it to her, here’s a paragraph from the letter (emphasis added):

You should not use this letter to take any adverse action against an employee just because his or her Social Security number appears on the list, such as laying off, suspending, firing , or discriminating against the individual. Doing so could, in fact, violate state or federal law and subject you to legal consequences.

You can see why most employers just throw these letters in the trash. Michael Chertoff, when he was Bush’s last secretary of homeland security, actually tried to fix this, by appending a letter from DHS to the no-match letter telling employers what steps they needed to take to protect themselves from “legal consequences” including, after exhausting all other possibilities (like a paperwork mix-up), firing the illegal-alien employee. The AFL-CIO, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and ACLU (which are really just three sides of the same coin when it comes to immigration) sued to stop Chertoff’s new rules, and the Obama administration dropped the matter entirely.

And finally, my colleague Ron Mortensen has looked at the employment documents Whitman provided reporters and concluded that her illegal-alien maid committed three, maybe four, felonies. Under this administration, she’s no more likely to be prosecuted than she is to get deported.

Mark Krikorian — Mark Krikorian, a nationally recognized expert on immigration issues, has served as Executive Director of the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) since 1995.

Most Popular


Understanding the Mind of Modern Atheists

‘Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away” (Matthew 24:35). Anthony DeStefano uses this Bible quote toward the end of his new book Inside the Atheist Mind: Unmasking the Religion of Those Who Say There Is No God, pointing to the resiliency and truth of Christianity. “You can hide it, ... Read More
Economy & Business

How the Constitution Limits State Taxes

Must a company have a physical presence in a state for that state to require it to collect taxes? The Supreme Court is considering that question, which has grown more important as online sales have taken off. The Competitive Enterprise Institute has submitted an excellent brief arguing that the answer is yes, at ... Read More

Off the Shelf: Suicide of the West

Editor’s Note: Every week, Michael Brendan Dougherty writes an “Off the Shelf” column sharing casual observations on the books he's reading and the passing scene. Before social media, Jonah Goldberg would respond to obstreperous emails from a much younger version of me with a characteristically light ... Read More

The Scholarship/Activism Balance — A Rejoinder

The Martin Center recently published an article by sociology professor Fabio Rojas, in which he argued that professors should maintain the right balance between their teaching and scholarship on the one hand, and activism on the other. In today's article, the Center's Jay Schalin pushes back somewhat. Schalin ... Read More