The Corner

Marco Rubio Is Not a Robot

Look, I’m under no illusions that last week’s now-infamous exchange with Chris Christie cost Marco Rubio dearly, but a bad three minutes does not a robot make. In my 20-plus years of constitutional litigation and conservative writing, I’ve had the opportunity to meet with any number of politicians, and Rubio has always stood out to me as one of three contemporary senators who are among the most genuine and thoughtful of all the politicians I’ve met. The other two are Nebraska’s Ben Sasse and Kentucky’s Rand Paul. (I haven’t spoken to Ted Cruz since law school, so I can’t make any personal assessment that isn’t dated by 22 years.)

In my experience in off-the-record conversations, Rubio is unguarded and deeply knowledgeable. If you talk to him for more than five minutes about the Middle East and the threat from radical Islam, you’ll know that he’s thought deeply about our challenge and is incredibly well-informed. And I say that from a position of inherent cynicism and skepticism. I’ve seen countless politicians – even in the most private of settings – never succeed in turning off the talking points. For some, it’s as if a life of constant campaigning — of never being sure if a comment will come back and bite them — has drained them of a piece of their humanity. Their robotic speech has transformed from a perceived political necessity to an essential part of their nature.

Yes, Rubio repeats himself at debates and on the stump, but so does every single politician. Donald Trump talks about “winning” so much that even Charlie Sheen is embarrassed, and how many times did we have to listen to Christie go through his tiresome act of pointing out how he’s a man of action before he mercifully exited the race? While talking points are irritating to the 0.001 percent of Americans who comment on politics, message discipline is indispensable to reaching the vast mass of Americans who don’t follow politics until the days before an election. “Hope and change” anyone? “Yes we can”?

Rubio’s exchange with Christie was damaging, but it does not reflect his inherent nature. And if he’s a robot for repeating himself, I look forward to legions of robot-costumed activists following every other candidate who repeats the same points on the stump and in debates. For more accurate reflection of the Rubio that I’ve talked to, I’d urge you to read Stephen F. Hayes’s excellent, extended report from inside the Rubio campaign. The picture it paints is far more nuanced — and far more accurate — than what we saw on the debate stage last Saturday night.

Most Popular


‘Epstein Didn’t Kill Himself’

It was just one more segment to fill out the hour, and thereby fill the long 24 hours of Saturday’s cable news on November 2. Or so it seemed. Navy SEAL Mike Ritland was on the Fox News program Watters World to talk to Jesse Watters about trained German shepherds like the one used in the raid that found ... Read More
Film & TV

The Manly Appeal of Ford v Ferrari

There used to be a lot of overlap between what we think of as a Hollywood studio picture (designed to earn money) and an awards movie (designed to fill the trophy case, usually with an accompanying loss of money). Ford v Ferrari is a glorious throwback to the era when big stars did quality movies about actual ... Read More
White House

Impeachment and the Broken Truce

The contradiction at the center of American politics in Anno Domini 2019 is this: The ruling class does not rule. The impeachment dog-and-pony show in Washington this week is not about how Donald Trump has comported himself as president (grotesquely) any more than early convulsions were about refreshed ... Read More
Politics & Policy

ABC Chief Political Analyst: GOP Rep. Stefanik a ‘Perfect Example’ of the Failures of Electing Someone ‘Because They Are a Woman’

Matthew Dowd, chief political analyst for ABC News, suggested that Representative Elise Stefanik (R., N.Y.) was elected due to her gender after taking issue with Stefanik's line of questioning during the first public impeachment hearing on Wednesday. “Elise Stefanik is a perfect example of why just electing ... Read More

What Happened to California Republicans?

From 1967 to 2019, Republicans controlled the California governorship for 31 of 52 years. So why is there currently not a single statewide Republican officeholder? California also has a Democratic governor and Democratic supermajorities in both houses of the state legislature. Only seven of California’s 53 ... Read More