The Corner

Media Matters vs. Me on the D.C. Circuit

Meagan Hatcher-Mays of Media Matters doesn’t like my column on the fight over Obama’s three nominations to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. I figured I’d read the post and see if there’s any good point in it I missed. Spoiler: There wasn’t.

She starts by saying that the headline on my column advanced a “discredited falsehood” by describing what Obama is doing as trying to “pack” the court. This is treated not as a question of whether a characterization is fair or not but as a simple matter of factual accuracy. That seems to me a foolish way of looking at it, and one for which she makes no argument. If you want more on the terminological point, see my post from yesterday.

Hatcher-Mays writes: “According to such varied sources as the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service and the right-wing Wall Street Journal, Obama’s nominees have faced unprecedented obstruction.” I assumed, when I read the bit about the Journal, that Hatcher-Mays was treating the news pages, or some liberal op-ed, as speaking for “the right-wing Wall Street Journal.” That’s exactly what she does. Her link takes you another left-wing Media Matters article, which cites WSJ columnist Gerald Seib, who is not part of the Journal’s editorial page, and is acknowledged by that earlier Media Matters article not to be part of the editorial page.

That earlier Media Matters post also says that “the Wall Street Journal” has been “ignoring that historic levels of GOP obstructionism have caused judicial emergencies.” So Hatcher-Mays has presented the Wall Street Journal as having said the exact opposite of what it did. I can’t blame her for not reading Media Matters posts carefully–it’s not a rewarding use of time–but if she is unwilling to do that, she shouldn’t cite the posts.

Seib’s column does not call the Republican campaign “unprecedented,” but does refer to the CRS report to make the point that wait times for nominees have been steadily increasing. (Hatcher-Mays’s “varied sources,” in other words, consist of one claim in one report and someone else who cited it.) The report, though, includes several other measures of how many nominees each president is getting through, and paints a more ambiguous picture than Hatcher-Mays acknowledges.

Here’s the second bullet point in its summary—and the first one that compares Obama’s record to that of his predecessors:

During the first terms of the five most recent Presidents (Reagan to Obama), the 30 confirmed Obama circuit court nominees were tied with 30 Clinton nominees as the fewest number of circuit nominees confirmed. The percentage of circuit nominees confirmed during President Obama’s first term, 71.4%, was the second-lowest, while the percentage confirmed during G.W. Bush’s first term, 67.3%, was the lowest.

Unprecedented! Um, except for that last guy.

Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

The Rural Way

Almost every national Election Night reveals the same old red/blue map. The country geographically is a sea of red. The coasts and small areas along the southern border and around the Great Lakes remain blue atolls. Yet when the maps are recalibrated for population rather than area, the blue areas blow up, ... Read More

The Rural Way

Almost every national Election Night reveals the same old red/blue map. The country geographically is a sea of red. The coasts and small areas along the southern border and around the Great Lakes remain blue atolls. Yet when the maps are recalibrated for population rather than area, the blue areas blow up, ... Read More

The Coup That Wasn’t

Donald Trump is not done challenging the results of the 2020 election in court, and he is by no means done complaining. But there will be no “coup.” Any prospect of Trump remaining in office without a legal process that declares him the recipient of more legal votes in the decisive states has now evaporated. ... Read More

The Coup That Wasn’t

Donald Trump is not done challenging the results of the 2020 election in court, and he is by no means done complaining. But there will be no “coup.” Any prospect of Trump remaining in office without a legal process that declares him the recipient of more legal votes in the decisive states has now evaporated. ... Read More
Elections

It’s Only ‘Free and Fair’ When We Win

Indeed, this is astonishing: https://twitter.com/felixsalmon/status/1331295033325219840 In 2018, after two years of media spinning tales about shady Russian infiltrators in our government, 67 percent of Democrats believed that Putin’s gremlins had bored into our voting machines and altered the outcome ... Read More
Elections

It’s Only ‘Free and Fair’ When We Win

Indeed, this is astonishing: https://twitter.com/felixsalmon/status/1331295033325219840 In 2018, after two years of media spinning tales about shady Russian infiltrators in our government, 67 percent of Democrats believed that Putin’s gremlins had bored into our voting machines and altered the outcome ... Read More
Books

Jordan Peterson v. the Publishing Mob

Staff at Penguin Random House Canada have “confronted management” about the decision to publish Jordan Peterson’s book in an “emotional town hall,” Vice reports. Peterson’s Beyond Order: 12 More Rules for Life will be released in March 2021. Apparently, one “junior employee who is a member of the ... Read More
Books

Jordan Peterson v. the Publishing Mob

Staff at Penguin Random House Canada have “confronted management” about the decision to publish Jordan Peterson’s book in an “emotional town hall,” Vice reports. Peterson’s Beyond Order: 12 More Rules for Life will be released in March 2021. Apparently, one “junior employee who is a member of the ... Read More
Elections

To ‘Steal’ an Election

Dan has a good article on the homepage, the main point of which is that the system worked, since Trump’s efforts to reverse the election failed. Certainly I agree with him about that. But he also finds charges that Trump tried to “steal” the election “overheated.” Since I made such a claim myself, I ... Read More
Elections

To ‘Steal’ an Election

Dan has a good article on the homepage, the main point of which is that the system worked, since Trump’s efforts to reverse the election failed. Certainly I agree with him about that. But he also finds charges that Trump tried to “steal” the election “overheated.” Since I made such a claim myself, I ... Read More