The Corner

Health Care

Medical Journal Pushes to Expand Obamacare

A sign on an insurance store advertises Obamacare in San Ysidro, San Diego, Calif., October 26, 2017. (Mike Blake/Reuters)

For those who thought Obamacare was on its last legs, think again. The medical intelligentsia wants centralized control over the entire health-care system by the federal government, and they are going to keep pushing and shoving until they get it.

In this episode of the ongoing saga, the New England Journal of Medicine — which often takes extreme progressive ideological positions — wants to expand Obamacare, to the point that millions of illegal aliens are legalized so they can receive coverage.

The article, written by bioethicists, first urges the government to coerce states that have refused to expand Medicaid into surrendering through a combination of carrots and sticks. From, Building on the ACA to Achieve Universal Coverage:

The stick is a reduction in the base federal matching rate for Medicaid spending in states that continue to refuse to implement the Medicaid expansion. The carrot is an increase in the matching rate for states that expand Medicaid coverage. These changes need not be particularly large to be effective; for example, increasing expansion states’ base federal matching rate by about 2 percentage points (or reducing nonexpansion states’ base federal matching rate by the same amount) would make expansion effectively free for a typical state. The small size of these adjustments would insulate this approach from being judged unconstitutionally coercive.

There’s no such thing as a free lunch, but never mind.

Next, expand subsidies:

The second step involves increasing and expanding eligibility for the subsidies available through the ACA’s health insurance marketplaces to encourage more people to take up coverage. This step includes increased tax credits to offset insurance premiums, higher cost-sharing subsidies to offset out-of-pocket costs, and extension of subsidies to people with incomes exceeding 400% of the federal poverty level, the current income limit on eligibility for marketplace assistance.

Third, force insurance policies on refuseniks:

They would be automatically enrolled in a “backstop” insurance plan, which could be either public or private. Health care providers would submit claims to the backstop plan whenever people in this group used health care services. On each year’s income tax return, people who lacked coverage other than the backstop plan for at least 1 month during the year would pay a premium for the backstop plan for each month they lacked other coverage, whether or not they actually used the backstop coverage.

Finally, get millions of illegal aliens eligible for coverage by any means necessary:

One sixth of the population [are] undocumented immigrants and therefore ineligible for both Medicaid and marketplace subsidies. The final step to universal coverage would be to ensure this group access to insurance programs. This goal can be achieved by creating a path to citizenship or in other ways. Expanding insurance coverage is far from the only rationale for reforming immigration policy, but without some such reform, genuinely universal coverage is impossible.

Isn’t it amazing how progressive policy proposals tend to dovetail? Gaia only knows what we would do with the millions of additional illegal immigrants that would be induced to sneak into the country by the prospect of health insurance coverage.

Because there can never be enough bureaucrats, the authors also urge expansion of the list of services that insurers must cover without cost and the creation of a public plan. You knew that was coming, didn’t you?

Bottom line: Would-be technocrats are on the march. Medicare for All isn’t the only threat that would consolidate government control over the entire healthcare system. Republicans had better come up with a more liberty-oriented approach — or this hyper-Obamacare monstrosity will become the conservative alternative to a single-payer catastrophe.

Most Popular


Angela Rye Knows You’re Racist

The political philosopher Michael Oakeshott said that the “rationalist” is hopelessly lost in ideology, captivated by the world of self-contained coherence he has woven from strands of human experience. He concocts a narrative about narratives, a story about stories, and adheres to the “large outline which ... Read More

What the Viral Border-Patrol Video Leaves Out

In an attempt to justify Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s absurd comparison of American detention facilities to Holocaust-era concentration camps, many figures within the media have shared a viral video clip of a legal hearing in which a Department of Justice attorney debates a panel of judges as to what constitutes ... Read More
Film & TV

Murder Mystery: An Old Comedy Genre Gets Polished Up

I  like Adam Sandler, and yet you may share the sense of trepidation I get when I see that another of his movies is out. He made some very funny manboy comedies (Billy Madison, Happy Gilmore, The Waterboy) followed by some not-so-funny manboy comedies, and when he went dark, in Reign over Me and Funny People, ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Making Sense of the Iran Chaos

One would prefer that correct decisions be made according to careful, deliberate plan. But a correct decision made impulsively, through a troubling process, is still nonetheless correct, and so it is with Donald Trump’s decision to refrain from military action against Iran. The proposed strike would represent a ... Read More