The Corner

Meet the New Dems, Same as the Old Dems

When President Obama signed the Budget Control Act into law, Americans were promised that it would slow Congress’s appetite for spending. CBO estimated that the new spending caps would reduce appropriations by about $825 billion. In FY 2012, the cap was set at $1,043 billion, a modest reduction of $7 billion from total regular appropriations last year. When Congress completed the appropriations process this past week, the beleaguered U.S. taxpayer should have had every assurance that Congress would abide by the spirit of the Act and stay under the cap.

Alas, Senate Democrats preferred the letter of that law and exploited the rules to end up spending more than was spent last year. Shockingly enough, President Obama signed without blinking.

The House of Representatives passed the last spending measure in three parts: H.R 2055, the Omnibus; H.R. 3672, which included program-integrity measures and disaster funding; and H. Con. Res. 94, a modest across-the-board reduction to offset the spending contained in H.R. 3672.

The Senate passed only two of the three measures. Care to guess which two?

Predictably, Senate Democrats supported the spending measures and not the reduction. Despite having over $1 trillion in appropriations, the thought of reducing spending by less than $9 billion was evidently too much pain to bear.

How? The “disaster trick.” The Budget Control Act allows for spending caps to be adjusted for disasters, up to a certain amount. For FY 2012, that amount was $11.3 billion. Between the end-of-year measure and disaster spending enacted earlier in the year, Congress has appropriated just shy of the full allowance, which allowed Congress to spend above the cap. H.R. 3672 contained $8.6 billion for disaster and program-integrity spending.

H. Con. Res 94, the third piece to the puzzle, provided $8.6 billion in savings to offset the disaster and program-integrity spending that breached the cap. If Senate Democrats had passed this measure, total appropriations (not including the war) would amount to $1,045 billion in FY 2012, reflecting about $2 billion above the cap in previously enacted disaster spending. Still, this amount would be about $5 billion below last year’s levels — a modest but meaningful decline.

Unfortunately, Senate Democrats (except Ben Nelson) couldn’t bring themselves to support this modest acknowledgment of reality and killed the measure. It seems that despite the advertising, the spending disaster — pun fully intended — continues.

You don’t have to believe me. For more detailed analyses, see the excellent pieces by the House and Senate Budget Committees.

Most Popular


Cold Brew’s Insidious Hegemony

Soon, many parts of the United States will be unbearably hot. Texans and Arizonans will be able to bake cookies on their car dashboards; the garbage on the streets of New York will be especially pungent; Washington will not only figuratively be a swamp. And all across America, coffee consumers will turn their ... Read More

Australia’s Voters Reject Leftist Ideas

Hell hath no fury greater than left-wingers who lose an election in a surprise upset. Think Brexit in 2016. Think Trump’s victory the same year. Now add Australia. Conservative prime minister Scott Morrison shocked pollsters and pundits alike with his victory on Saturday, and the reaction has been brutal ... Read More
National Security & Defense

The Warmonger Canard

Whatever the opposite of a rush to war is — a crawl to peace, maybe — America is in the middle of one. Since May 5, when John Bolton announced the accelerated deployment of the Abraham Lincoln carrier group to the Persian Gulf in response to intelligence of a possible Iranian attack, the press has been aflame ... Read More
NR Webathon

We’ve Had Bill Barr’s Back

One of the more dismaying features of the national political debate lately is how casually and cynically Attorney General Bill Barr has been smeared. He is routinely compared to Roy Cohn on a cable-TV program that prides itself on assembling the most thoughtful and plugged-in political analysts and ... Read More
Film & TV

Game of Thrones: A Father’s Legacy Endures

Warning! If you don't want to read any spoilers from last night's series finale of Game of Thrones, stop reading. Right now. There is a lot to unpack about the Thrones finale, and I fully understand many of the criticisms I read on Twitter and elsewhere. Yes, the show was compressed. Yes, there were moments ... Read More