The Corner

Politics & Policy

Some Early Thoughts on the Clown Show

Michael Cohen, flanked by attorneys Lanny Davis (left) and Mike Monico, testifies before a House Committee on Oversight and Reform, February 27, 2019. (Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)

I’ve only been checking in periodically with the clown show in Congress today. A few things stand out:

  • GOP Congressmen keep citing mainstream news outlets as dispositive proof of Cohen’s shabbiness and deceit. That’s fine with me, but it’s funny how “fake news” can be useful when you need it.
  • In the early part of the hearings, Cohen was asked about his past statements in defense of Trump as proof that he was a liar. I’m not sure this makes the point his interrogators want to make. If he was a liar when he was Trump’s fixer, that means all of the wonderful things he said about him were lies.
  • The Russia collusion narrative took a pretty big hit today.
  • Cohen is obviously trying to give the resistance catnip in an effort to be a new John Dean, another sleazy fraud who became a hero to liberals because he’s a thorn in Nixon’s side. It’s fine to say that Cohen is a grifter and a liar saying things to save his own skin. That doesn’t make him a good person but it also doesn’t mean all of the things he’s saying are lies. David French had it right yesterday; if there’s no corroborating evidence — cancelled checks, letters, testimony whatever — there’s no reason to credit what Cohen says. Likewise, there’s no reason to think he’s suddenly a good person just because he says things that liberals want to hear.
  • Last, even if you take the extreme, often hysterical, position of some of the Republicans on the committee, that still leaves you with incredibly inconvenient fact that this is someone Trump hired, promoted, and trusted for years. He was a vice-president of the Trump Organization, personal counsel to Trump and a former co-president of Trump Entertainment and a board member of the Eric Trump foundation. He was also deputy finance chair of the RNC from 2017 to 2018. You can insist that Cohen is a horrible, no good, awful specimen of the most coprophagic phylum of humanity but you are still stuck with the problem of reconciling that with Trump’s claims that he is an incredible judge of character and talent and “hires the best people.”

Something to Consider

If you enjoyed this article, we have a proposition for you: Join NRPLUS. Members get all of our content (including the magazine), no paywalls or content meters, an advertising-minimal experience, and unique access to our writers and editors (conference calls, social-media groups, etc.). And importantly, NRPLUS members help keep NR going. Consider it?

If you enjoyed this article, and were stimulated by its contents, we have a proposition for you: Join NRPLUS.

LEARN MORE

Most Popular

Elections

Elizabeth Warren Is Jussie Smollett

Elizabeth Warren has a moving story about being fired from a teaching job because she was pregnant, a story that perfectly complements her political narrative that she is the tribune and champion of those who have been treated unfairly by the powerful. Joe Biden has a moving — and horrifying — story about his ... Read More
PC Culture

Defiant Dave Chappelle

When Dave Chappelle’s Netflix special Sticks & Stones came out in August, the overwhelming response from critics was that it was offensive, unacceptable garbage. Inkoo Kang of Slate declared that Chappelle’s “jokes make you wince.” Garrett Martin, in the online magazine Paste, maintained that the ... Read More
Culture

The Origins of the Transgender Movement

Editor’s Note: This article has been adapted from remarks delivered at a Heritage Foundation summit. I’ve been asked to talk about the origins of transgenderism and how it relates to children and their exploitation. But first, I would like to start with a little story. Yesterday I was wandering around ... Read More
Film & TV

Joker: An Honest Treatment of Madness

When I saw that the New York Times and The New Yorker had run columns berating the new Joker movie, criticizing it not simply on cinematic grounds but instead insisting that the film amounted to a clandestine defense of “whiteness” in an attempt to buttress the electoral aim of “Republicans” — this is a ... Read More