The Corner

Politics & Policy

In Missouri, Another Supermajority Passes Another Heartbeat Bill

Missouri State House is pictured in Jefferson City, Mo. (Mike Segar/Reuters)

The momentum for heartbeat bills is not slowing down. After a House of Representatives vote this afternoon, Missouri is now set to be the sixth state this year to pass either a heartbeat bill or even stricter legislation in a direct frontal assault on Roe. And once again, the law passed through the legislature by a supermajority margin — 110-44 in the House and 24-10 in the Missouri Senate. The Missouri bill bans abortion after eights weeks, and as CNN reports, it includes exceptions for what it defines as medical emergencies, such as cases when the mother’s life is at risk or she is facing serious permanent injury, but not for pregnancies that are the result of rape or incest.

It’s interesting to me that the avalanche of (mainly online) outrage at these state heartbeat laws often glides right over their consistent, huge margins of legislative support. Look at these numbers in the lower house and upper house, respectively:

-Alabama: 74-3 and 25-7;

-Georgia: 92-78 and 34-18

-Kentucky: 71-19 and 31-6

-Mississippi: 78-37 and 34-14

-Ohio: 56-40 and 19-13

Majorities this lopsided aren’t the result of men oppressing women, but rather women and men joining together to expressed shared political goals and engage in united cultural activism. Majorities this lopsided demonstrate that in these states, at least, there is nothing extreme about the laws they passed.

When New York passed its own, very liberal, abortion law it did so by similarly large margins — 92-47 in the Assembly and 38-24 in the Senate. Americans are sorting themselves into different communities with different cultural values, but only progressive communities have the legal ability to define and protect human life in a manner consistent with their deepest beliefs. This divergence worsens the Roe wound on the American body politic. Entire American states, representing tens of millions of American citizens, are rapidly rejecting abortion and seeking to establish communities that protect their most vulnerable members. As state after state declares its intentions, perhaps the Supreme Court will finally hear the call, recognize that the Founders had no intention to establish a right to kill a child, and let Kentucky be Kentucky and New York be New York.

David French is a senior writer for National Review, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, and a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Most Popular


It’s Time for Colin Kaepernick to Move On

Colin Kaepernick. Remember him? Below-average quarterback. Above-average poseur. Not “activist,” not really. Activists actually say stuff. Kaepernick almost never says anything. He’s like the Queen or most popes — you have to read the deep-background musings of supposed members of his inner circle to get ... Read More

The Age of Miscalculation

On August 7, 1998, more than 200 people were killed in terrorist attacks on U.S. embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. Americans learned three names most of them never had heard before: Ayman al-Zawahiri, Osama bin Laden, and al-Qaeda. On August 20, 1998, President Bill Clinton ordered a ... Read More

Jay-Z Joins the Ranks of the Insufficiently Woke

Rapper and mogul Jay-Z announced his company’s new partnership with the National Football League and has made much of the social-justice Left furious: I think that we forget that Colin [Kaepernick]’s whole thing was to bring attention to social injustice, correct? So, in that case, this is a success; this is ... Read More