The Corner

Montana Senate Defeats Assisted-Suicide Prohibition

On Monday, the Montana state senate voted 27–23 to defeat a bill that would have definitively outlawed doctor-assisted suicide in the state. The legislation was first introduced in February as a response to a Montana supreme court decision from 2009 that determined that Montana law does not forbid assisted suicide for terminally ill patients. The court stopped short of making assisted suicide a constitutional right in the state however, giving the legislature the opportunity to clarify the law and prohibit doctor-assisted suicide.

The defeat of this bill is a serious setback in the fight to protect the rights and dignity of terminally ill and disabled patients, a struggle that will become more important with the graying of the American population. Although efforts to legalize assisted suicide have so far met with limited success in most states — a Massachusetts ballot initiative was defeated in last November’s election, a bill in Connecticut recently stalled in committee, and a bill being considered by the Vermont legislature was largely rewritten by the state senate in February to remove language that would have permitted doctor-assisted suicide. But other states, including Maine, New Jersey, and Kansas, still have dangerous assisted-suicide laws winding their way through their legislatures this year.

If the Montana bill had been enacted — if, after the state supreme court ruled that assisted suicide was legally permissible, lawmakers had acted to prohibit the practice — it would have been a valuable example of legislators pushing back against the supposedly inevitable expansion of the shallow, autonomy-based ethic that endorses killing, rather than caring for the elderly and vulnerable. That the bill failed should serve as a reminder that defending the dignity of terminally ill patients means more than resisting demands for a “right to die.” Actively advancing the culture of life in America means taking a clear stand for the dignity of human life by crafting policies that will put a stop to the abuse of patients and the elderly while offering real alternatives for terminally ill patients by improving access to palliative care — sending a clear message that death with dignity does not mean death by prescription.

— Brendan P. Foht is assistant editor of The New Atlantis: A Journal of Technology and Society.

Most Popular

White House

What Is Hillary Clinton Thinking?

When Homer Simpson looks in the mirror, he sees ripped chest muscles and arms like the trunks of beech trees. When Hillary Clinton looks in the mirror, she sees America’s sweetheart. She thinks: America adores me. She thinks: America already chose me to be president once! She thinks: Everyone is comparing me ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Grassley’s Kangaroo Court

So now it looks like next Thursday. On Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s manifestly meritorious nomination to the Supreme Court, what was supposed to be the vote out of the Senate Judiciary Committee this past Thursday now appears to be sliding into a hearing to be held next Thursday. Or, who knows, maybe a Thursday ... Read More
Law & the Courts

And Then There Was One . . .

Well, we seem to have hit a brick wall. All four of the people named by Kavanaugh's accuser have now given their accounts to the Senate. And all four of them have said either that Kavanaugh is innocent of all charges, or that they have no recollection of his doing anything -- anything -- wrong. Put as simply as ... Read More