The Corner

More on the Chinese Census

The first number everyone wanted to know from China’s 2010 census was the TFR — Total Fertility Rate. The second is the SRB — Sex Ratio at Birth.

The Chinese have been practicing sex-selective feticide on a large scale since cheap prenatal ultrasound scanning became available in the early 1980s. Given the cultural preference for male children, the result has been an excess of males, the oldest demographic cohorts affected being now in their late twenties.

The TFR and the SRB interact in an interesting way. Chinese statistics should always be viewed with suspicion, but we have good-quality data from other countries with the same problem, notably South Korea. What this data tells us is that the SRB for first births is normal almost everywhere. It’s in second and subsequent births that the imbalance shows up.

For South Korea in 1992, for example, one of the tables in this paper gives the following SRBs for first, second, third, and fourth births respectively: 106, 113, 196, 229. (I.e. 106 male babies per 100 female, etc. Note: An SRB of 105 is normal for north-Eurasian populations. Ma Nature knows that males are less likely to make it to childbearing age.)

It follows that as TFR drops, the SRB trends back to normal. This in fact seems to have happened in South Korea, where the SRB is indeed almost normal now, after decades of imbalance. It’s normal because South Korea’s TFR is around 1.2. When hardly anyone is having a second-or-subsequent child, unbalanced SRBs in that zone hardly matter!

You may be thinking that since China has a one-child policy, it ought to have a nearly-normal SRB. That misunderstands the policy, which for many years now has only been strictly applied in urban districts. Rural couples are allowed a second child without penalty if the first child is a girl; and with rising personal income the penalties have anyway become manageable for great numbers of Chinese people. That is not even to mention the fact that after 62 years under communism, with 2,200 years of bureaucratic despotism preceding that, the Chinese are Olympic-class gamers of the system. The paper I linked to above shows the following SRBs for first, second, third, and fourth births respectively in 2001 China: 106, 124, 128, 131.

There is some speculation about what the social and political effects of the male surplus will be. Some writers have argued that it will have national-security implications for the U.S.A. I say fiddlesticks. It’s been the case in societies all over, all through history, that there were not enough brides for the available men. This was certainly so in China because of polygamy. A dear old friend of mine, recently deceased, was born in Guangdong Province in the late 1920s to a father with seven wives. (And this, note, in a nation where female infanticide was still in play, as it had been among the poorer class of peasants since time immemorial.)

Even in monogamous cultures there have been adult sex-ratio imbalances due to such factors as male deaths in war and vendetta, and the shunting off of high-status females to convents. If there’s any good data showing that popualtions with surplus males are more prone to warfare or despotism than those without, I’d like to see it. As Mara Hvistendahl notes in her forthcoming book on the subject, “Adolf Hitler came to power at a time when Germany had over 2 million more women than men as a result of the toll taken by World War I.”

So what’s the mystery number, China’s 2010 SRB? Looks like 118. Google News “china census” for more details and some different opinions. If 118 is right, that’s a slight falling-off from the middle of the decade, probably just due to declining TFR on the South Korean pattern.

John Derbyshire — Mr. Derbyshire is a former contributing editor of National Review.

Most Popular


Kamala Harris Runs for Queen

I’m going to let you in on a secret about the 2020 presidential contest: Unless unforeseen circumstances lead to a true wave election, the legislative stakes will be extremely low. The odds are heavily stacked against Democrats’ retaking the Senate, and that means that even if a Democrat wins the White House, ... Read More

What We’ve Learned about Jussie Smollett

It’s been a few weeks since March 26, when all charges against Jussie Smollett were dropped and the actor declared that his version of events had been proven correct. How’s that going? Smollett’s celebrity defenders have gone quiet. His publicists and lawyers are dodging reporters. The @StandwithJussie ... Read More
Energy & Environment

The Climate Trap for Democrats

The more the climate debate changes, the more it stays the same. Polls show that the public is worried about climate change, but that doesn’t mean that it is any more ready to bear any burden or pay any price to combat it. If President Donald Trump claws his way to victory again in Pennsylvania and the ... Read More
White House

Sarah Sanders to Resign at End of June

Sarah Huckabee Sanders will resign from her position as White House press secretary at the end of the month, President Trump announced on Twitter Thursday afternoon. Sanders, the daughter of former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee, succeeded Sean ... Read More
Politics & Policy

But Why Is Guatemala Hungry?

I really, really don’t want to be on the “Nicolas Kristof Wrote Something Dumb” beat, but, Jiminy Cricket! Kristof has taken a trip to Guatemala, with a young woman from Arizona State University in tow. “My annual win-a-trip journey,” he writes. Reporting from Guatemala, he discovers that many ... Read More
Politics & Policy

On Painting Air Force One

And so it has come to this. Two oil tankers were just attacked in the Gulf of Oman, presumably by Iran. The United States and China are facing off in a confrontation that is about far more than trade. The southern border remains anarchic and uncontrolled. And Congress is asking: “Can I get the icon in ... Read More