The Corner

More E-Verify

Rich Nadler finds my numbers about the rapid spread of E-Verify “puzzling.” It’s not clear why.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey reports monthly on the number of hires. In 2008, there were a total of 51,922,000 hires; Nadler confidently asserts that “Job churn cannot account for anywhere near this many” — well, sorry, but it does. About 13 percent of this total were checked through E-Verify. (Here is our brief report on the numbers, which we got through the mysterious process called “reporting.”) If the rate of E-Verify use for this year holds steady, depending on the number of total hires this year (almost certainly down from last year), I guessed that from one-quarter to one-third of all new hires would be checked this year, Actually, if E-Verify use continues to grow (as is likely under the new management, since they can point to it as evidence of their commitment to enforcement) and the number of new hires falls, we could see as many as half of this year’s new hires be cleared through E-Verify. But the specific numbers aren’t the point; instead, the point is that E-Verify has rapidly become a standard part of the hiring process, despite the scorched-earth opposition by the rope-sellers at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

I don’t know if McDonald’s Corp. is a user, but some franchisees are. In fact, there’s a database of employers using the program, which allows you to search by name, location, and industry, though it was last updated in July, so there are something twice as many employers now signed up. My own office manager has been using E-Verify for a couple of years now, and is quite pleased with it. I’d encourage all employers, private and government, to sign up for it. An introduction to the program is here, and employer registration is here.

Finally, Nadler asks “If E-Verify is applied only to new hires, and not to existing employees, then roughly 7 million currently employed illegals receive a de facto amnesty of indefinite duration. Is this acceptable to you?” Yes, it is acceptable, because the description of this approach as “de facto amnesty” is based on the false dichotomy of amnesty or mass deportation. In fact, because of job churn, many of the illegal aliens currently employed will indeed be exposed over time, incrementally (hence “attrition through enforcement“), as they lose or leave their earlier jobs and look for new ones. What’s more, the main vehicle to phase in E-Verify use for all employers (Rep. Heath Shuler’s SAVE Act) would indeed require eventual vetting of existing employees.

Mark Krikorian — Mark Krikorian, a nationally recognized expert on immigration issues, has served as Executive Director of the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) since 1995.

Most Popular

U.S.

Questions for Those Who Believed Jussie Smollett

The “we reported the Jussie Smollett case responsibly” contention has been blasted to smithereens. Twitter accounts and headlines in the Washington Post, the New York Times, and the Los Angeles Times reported as fact Jussie Smollett’s wildly implausible allegations, and many other journalists did so as ... Read More
U.S.

Regular Order

Jussie Smollett’s story has always sounded a little . . . extraordinary. Smollett, who appears on the television series Empire, says he was attacked on the streets of Chicago at 2 a.m. by two men who shouted racial and homophobic abuses at him, beat him, doused him with bleach, and fastened a noose around ... Read More