The Corner

More on Fast and Furious and Gun Control

Senator Chuck Grassley has a new memo (starting on page four of the PDF). It contains a paragraph describing a rather odd situation: An ATF agent was asked by his supervisor (David Voth) to trace guns that hadn’t been recovered at crime scenes yet. This was not for informational purposes: The agent already had access to the Suspect Gun Database, which contained all the data about these guns that a conventional trace would uncover. The supervisor said the traces would provide information for officers who found the guns in the future: If an officer traced the gun, he’d be notified of the previous trace and realize that the gun was part of a special operation. When he asked around, this agent found that several others had been asked to do the same thing.

The alternative explanation is that these traces were done to pad the statistics — gun traces are often cited as evidence as to how (and how many) guns find their way to criminals. Most notoriously, the president and the media are obsessed with the percentage of Mexican crime guns traced to the U.S., even though Mexico doesn’t submit all of the crime guns it finds to the ATF for tracing.

I’m not sold. The supervisor’s explanation sounds plausible, for one thing. For another, the ATF statistics that the president cited pertain to guns recovered in Mexico; there’s no sign that the agent was told to trace the guns in such a way that they would be counted in these numbers. The memo doesn’t say how many traces there were, but there were something like 2,000 total Fast and Furious guns, whereas the ATF traces around 10,000 Mexican-submitted guns to the U.S. each year and handles hundreds of thousands of traces in total.

And even if these traces were an attempt to pad statistics, it’s not clear why the ATF would let the guns go to Mexico. Why not just run a bunch of fake traces and not get anyone killed?

What the conspiracy theorists are looking for is proof that Fast and Furious was designed, from the get-go, to create a rationale for gun control. This doesn’t prove that.

Hat tip to Dave Hardy.

Most Popular


Put Up or Shut Up on These Accusations, Hillary

Look, one 2016 candidate being prone to wild and baseless accusations is enough. Appearing on Obama campaign manager David Plouffe’s podcast, Hillary Clinton suggested that 2016 Green Party candidate Jill Stein was a “Russian asset,” that Republicans and Russians were promoting the Green Party, and ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Elizabeth Warren Is Not Honest

If you want to run for office, political consultants will hammer away at one point: Tell stories. People respond to stories. We’ve been a story-telling species since our fur-clad ancestors gathered around campfires. Don’t cite statistics. No one can remember statistics. Make it human. Make it relatable. ... Read More
National Review


Today is my last day at National Review. It's an incredibly bittersweet moment. While I've only worked full-time since May, 2015, I've contributed posts and pieces for over fifteen years. NR was the first national platform to publish my work, and now -- thousands of posts and more than a million words later -- I ... Read More
Economy & Business

Andrew Yang, Snake Oil Salesman

Andrew Yang, the tech entrepreneur and gadfly, has definitely cleared the bar for a successful cause candidate. Not only has he exceeded expectations for his polling and fundraising, not only has he developed a cult following, not only has he got people talking about his signature idea, the universal basic ... Read More

Feminists Have Turned on Pornography

Since the sexual revolution of the 1960s, the feminist movement has sought to condemn traditional sexual ethics as repressive, misogynistic, and intolerant. As the 2010s come to a close, it might be fair to say that mainstream culture has reached the logical endpoint of this philosophy. Whereas older Americans ... Read More
White House

The Impeachment Defense That Doesn’t Work

If we’ve learned anything from the last couple of weeks, it’s that the “perfect phone call” defense of Trump and Ukraine doesn’t work. As Andy and I discussed on his podcast this week, the “perfect” defense allows the Democrats to score easy points by establishing that people in the administration ... Read More

Democrats Think They Can Win without You

A  few days ago, Ericka Anderson, an old friend of National Review, popped up in the pages of the New York Times lamenting that “the Democratic presidential field neglects abundant pools of potential Democrat converts, leaving persuadable audiences — like independents and Trump-averse, anti-abortion ... Read More
PC Culture

Defiant Dave Chappelle

When Dave Chappelle’s Netflix special Sticks & Stones came out in August, the overwhelming response from critics was that it was offensive, unacceptable garbage. Inkoo Kang of Slate declared that Chappelle’s “jokes make you wince.” Garrett Martin, in the online magazine Paste, maintained that the ... Read More