This reader sums it up nicely:
As Reynolds states, he’s not exactly addressing your point but I don’t
even think he adds tangentially to the discussion. Simply put, you’re
saying it’s wrong while Glenn says it’s legal. But that IS your point:
It’s ASSUMED that it’s legal and your illuminating the inherent
hypocrisy in making the portrayal that it’s OK to get mushy about the
expected infant while retaining the right to end its life in utero.
Glenn, as much as I like his work, simply falls back on, “Yeah, but it’s