The Corner

More Muddle at the Post

The mosque controversy is all over the WaPo today: Milbank and a news piece on A2, an editorial and, on the op-ed page, Cohen, Robinson, and Greg Sargent. Sargent’s target is Harry Reid, whose spokesman says he thinks that the mosque-makers have a First Amendment right to do what they’re doing but shouldn’t do it–which, as Sargent notes, is the position of “many Republicans” (it’s also my view).

In his initial comment, Sargent writes, “The second most powerful Democrat in the country is not willing to support the President in his efforts to defend the right of Muslims to build a cultural center on private property, if the site in question is in the vicinity of Ground Zero.” But Reid has affirmed their legal right, just as Obama has done.

Sargent starts his follow-up thus: “Some are pointing out that Harry Reid, by citing the First Amendment and religious freedom, is reaffirming the group’s right to build the project. That’s true. But it’s not terribly relevant in the current political context.” Back up a second. If it is “true” that Reid is “reaffirming the group’s right to build the project,” then it cannot be true that he is not willing “to defend the right of Muslims to build a cultural center.” If his follow-up comment is right, his initial take was wrong. Would it kill him to say so?

In the paper version of Sargent’s post, he writes, “Reid is parting ways with Obama, who took a big risk to do the right thing in supporting the project. Obama did not explicitly endorse the decision to build the center, but he said that if the group proceeds, we must respect that decision, in accordance with American values. That’s what made Obama’s stance brave.” Greg Sargent has every legal right to split hairs in this ridiculous manner, but the rest of us need not support his exercise of the right.

Ramesh Ponnuru — Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg View, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular


Why Does Russia Build So Many Doomsday Weapons?

While America’s ruling and chattering classes were chasing Moose and Squirrel, back on planet Earth the Russians have been busy building a doomsday bomb. As Vladimir Putin alluded to in his March 1 address to the Federal Assembly, the Russians have developed, among other “superweapons,” a Doomsday ... Read More

Enoch Powell’s Immigration Speech, 50 Years Later

The 20th of this month marks a significant anniversary in Britain. For it is the 50th anniversary of what is probably the most famous -- and certainly the most notorious -- speech by any mainstream politician since the war. On April 20, 1968, Enoch Powell gave a speech to the Conservative Political Centre in ... Read More
Economy & Business

A Trump Trade and Economic Doctrine

If the Treasury Department’s recent semiannual report is any guide, the Trump administration still doesn’t quite get it when it comes to trade imbalances. “The US government has all the tools it needs to achieve balanced trade without risking a trade war,” writes Joseph Gagnon for the Peterson Institute ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Comey–Trump Dance

I never thought the Comey book would make much news for the simple reason that it would be outrageous if it did. If Comey knew something relevant and important about the Russia investigation that we didn’t already know, he couldn’t possibly put it in his book. Let’s say he did have something big on the ... Read More