The Corner

National Security & Defense

MSNBC Airs Propaganda Map of Palestinian ‘Land Loss’

Apparently unsatisfied with merely skewed coverage, MSNBC went for out-and-out propaganda during last Thursday’s Live with Kate Snow, airing a map of Palestinians’ “loss of land” since 1946:

Obviously, it shows no such thing. But the image accompanied an interview with Martin Fletcher, MSNBC’s Middle East “expert,” who, naturally, waxed mournful:

This is what it’s all about. It’s all about the land what this map shows you. I must say it’s pretty shocking when you present it in this way. What it clearly shows is that if there’s no peace agreement between the Palestinians and Israel, more of those green areas, more of that Palestinian land will be eaten up by Jewish settlements. Although right now there is a freeze on settlements by Israel, because there’s so much international pressure, the Palestinians say, if we don’t have peace, soon we won’t have a Palestine left.

Here’s the full clip:

Omri Ceren of the Israel Project spotted the clip on Friday, and over the weekend social-media users piled on MSNBC for the error. On Sunday afternoon, following a query from the Washington Free Beacon, MSNBC admitted that the image was “factually wrong” and said it would issue a correction sometime Monday. Fletcher added a partial apology: “The first of the four maps was dead wrong and should not have been included. I wish I had pointed that out when I first saw it.”

But it’s not just the first map. The “1946” panel ignores the fact that the territory in question in fact wasn’t Palestinian-controlled in 1946, but was under British Mandatory rule until May 1948. The second map signifies . . . well, nothing at all, since the U.N’s proposed 1947 partition never took effect (because Palestinian leadership rejected it). The “1949-1967” panel, which shows the “armistice lines” from Israel’s War of Independence that persisted until Israel’s victory in the 1967’s Six Days War, neglects to mention that the Gaza Strip and the West Bank were administered not by Palestinians but by Egypt and Jordan, respectively. And while the “Present” map rightly shows Palestinians in control of territory, the division of authority in the wake of the 1995 Oslo II accords and Israel’s “disengagement” is so complex as to make this map useless.

Writing in The Tower in January, Shany Mor, a former foreign policy director for the Israeli National Security Council, summarizes the “mendacious maps of Palestinian ‘loss’” this way:

Taken together, what we have is not four maps in a chronological series, but four different categories of territorial control presented with varying degrees of inaccuracy. Those categories are private property (“1946”), political control (“1967” and “[Present]”), and international partition plans (“1947”). They are presented in a fashion that is either tendentiously inaccurate (“[Present]”), essentially mendacious (“1947” and “1967”), or radically untrue (“1946”).

More accurate, he notes, would be a series of maps separately addressing each of the above categories. To accurately chronicle, say, the 50-year change in “Palestinian-Arab political control,” Mor offers the following:

That suggests a rather different story than the preferred one of uninhibited Israeli rapacity. I wouldn’t expect MSNBC to air it anytime soon.

Most Popular

Film & TV

Netflix Debuts Its Obama Manifesto

This week’s widespread media blitz heralding Netflix’s broadcast of its first Obama-endorsed presentation, American Factory, was more than synchronicity. It felt as though U.S. publicists and journalists collectively exhaled their relief at finally regaining the bully pulpit. Reviews of American Factory, a ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Capital versus Tucker Carlson

Advertisers do not advertise on Tucker Carlson’s show to endorse the views of Tucker Carlson. They advertise on his show for the same reason they advertise elsewhere: a captive audience — in Tucker’s case, the second-largest one in cable news — might spare thirty seconds of attention that will, they hope, ... Read More
Natural Law

Are Your Sexual Preferences Transphobic?

Last year, a study exploring “transgender exclusion from the world of dating” was published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. Of nearly 1,000 participants, the overwhelming majority, 87.5 percent, irrespective of their sexual preference, said they would not consider dating a trans person, ... Read More