The Corner

Much More Than “One-Day Blog Chatter”

I like Gwen Ifill, always have. But her retort in an AP story about the worry over her conflicts in the upcoming debate tonight is unworthy of the professional journalist she has always been, and reveals her to be completely clueless about the nature of the ethical questions raised:

“Do you think they made the same assumptions about Lou Cannon (who is white) when he wrote his book about Reagan?” said Ifill, who is black. Asked if there were racial motives at play, she said, “I don’t know what it is. I find it curious.”

That is, to be frank, an embarrassing  statement. Does Ifill really believe that there would not have been outrage had a Lou Cannon been asked to moderate the 1984 Ferraro/Bush vice-presidential debate, with the 11th-hour knowledge that he was at that very time writing a favorable assessment of Reagan, in a book with the subtitle “Age of Reagan” — due out, by his own intent, on January 20 Inauguration Day to enhance the book’s sales with the expectation of a Reagan swearing-in?

Suggesting (if that is what the quote was) a racial motive for principled criticism of this ethical dilemma is, well, beneath contempt. During this entire depressing campaign season, beginning with the Obama/Clinton primaries, there have been two disturbing developments: one, the overt, unapologetic media bias on behalf of Obama; and, two, the preemptive use of the race card (on two occasions by Obama himself) to suggest that legitimate criticism is proof of prejudice. Unfortunately in this instance Ifill has managed to remind us of both those sad developments yet again.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

The Judicial Branch Ragnarök Is Upon Us

As expected, President Trump selected Amy Coney Barrett as his third nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court, and now the Judicial Branch Ragnarök and Related Festival of Catholic-Bashing is upon us. Senate Democrats could argue that based upon Barrett’s past decisions, they don’t agree with her legal ... Read More
Law & the Courts

The Judicial Branch Ragnarök Is Upon Us

As expected, President Trump selected Amy Coney Barrett as his third nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court, and now the Judicial Branch Ragnarök and Related Festival of Catholic-Bashing is upon us. Senate Democrats could argue that based upon Barrett’s past decisions, they don’t agree with her legal ... Read More

BLM Becomes the PLO

I am inclined to think that the Palestinians have some legitimate beefs, historically speaking. I just don’t care very much. You blow up children in pizza shops, and your priorities go right to the bottom of my global humanitarian to-do list. Palestinians want a state? I wouldn’t lend Mahmoud Abbas a cup ... Read More

BLM Becomes the PLO

I am inclined to think that the Palestinians have some legitimate beefs, historically speaking. I just don’t care very much. You blow up children in pizza shops, and your priorities go right to the bottom of my global humanitarian to-do list. Palestinians want a state? I wouldn’t lend Mahmoud Abbas a cup ... Read More
Law & the Courts

On Judge Barrett, Let’s Tell the Truth

Once when I was a kid, my dad held up three fingers and asked, “Does this two look like a three?” Little did I know that this attempted sleight of hand would become a regular feature of the process for appointing federal judges. Watch for it in the days ahead as the Senate considers President Donald Trump’s ... Read More
Law & the Courts

On Judge Barrett, Let’s Tell the Truth

Once when I was a kid, my dad held up three fingers and asked, “Does this two look like a three?” Little did I know that this attempted sleight of hand would become a regular feature of the process for appointing federal judges. Watch for it in the days ahead as the Senate considers President Donald Trump’s ... Read More