The Corner

Muravchik and the Dems

Jonah, I’m headed out for some travel, and so don’t have time for back-and-forth on Muravchik’s piece. But let me note quickly that I found Muravchik’s defense of democratization theory unconvincing.

Muravchik says that even had we installed and backed a single strong leader, American troops would still have had to sustain him. That’s true, but it does not follow, as Muravchik claims, that our military burdens would have been the same in that case as they are now. No-one can know the outcome of this counter-factual, but it is certainly conceivable that a U.S. backed strongman might have had more success at keeping rebellious factions mollified and in check than what we’ve seen take place so far. Again, this can’t be known one way or another, but for that very reason, we can’t take Muravchik’s assurance as valid.

Muravchik says that such democracy as has taken hold in Iraq has “made our burdens there so much lighter.” I find this unconvincing, and it seems more an assertion than an argument. Muravchik says high voter participation and “a degree of give-and-take among the various factions” shows that “democratization can be said to have received a decent start in Iraq.” Again, this is unconvincing. I’m not sure what a bad start for democracy would look like, if what we’ve seen so far is decent.

Muravchik says outsiders can help start successful democracy. He may be right in some cases, but this begs the question of whether a strategy heavily dependent on outsiders will succeed in the Middle East. Muravchik says American democracy itself depended on outside help from Lafayette. Well, America had a deep indigenous tradition of democracy. Iraq does not. The Lafayette analogy is so strained that it only makes Muravchik’s argument look weak.

The root of the problem is that Muravchik still identifies democracy too heavily with elections. He talks about the need to change the “political culture” of the Middle East, but his notion of political culture is, by my lights, far too shallow. Muravchik thinks elections “will work to pacify” an excessively violent political culture. But this puts the cart before the horse. The absence of elections is not the cause of factional fighting. That is why the presence of elections has done little to stem such fighting. The existence of a social system based on tribal and religious factionalism explains why elections by themselves have been unable to transport a liberal political culture to Iraq. Only a slow and deep shift toward a liberal political culture could allow a democratization strategy work in the Middle East. For that to happen, elections should come after deeper, liberalizing social change, not before. (For my detailed views on this, see “Democratic Imperialism.”)

In short, while it’s clear that Muravchik has not changed his mind about democratization, I don’t think he’s even begun to meet the objections of sceptics. In my reading, Muravchik has restated his conclusions about democratization, but has not argued for them in any detail. Nor do I see how any scenario in Iraq would have made Muravchik change his mind. I’m not sure how the aftermath of elections could have been much more discouraging than what we’ve seen in Iraq. At this point, the “quick elections are the solution” theory still seems to me to be running on empty.

As I’ve noted before, the interesting thing is that the center of democratization theory has now shifted to the Democrats. Have a look at the “After Iraq” symposium in the new liberal policy journal “Democracy.” Notice that the piece by Will Marshall advocates backing the right of Egyptian Islamists like the Muslim Brotherhood to participate in elections, while Larry Diamond is talking about promoting democracy through “serious and sustained dialogue” with various Islamists. Folks still don’t realize what’s going to happen if the Democrats get in. The notion of quick democratization in the Muslim world isn’t going to be pared back, it’s going to be supercharged. The Dems are going to take a precipitous democratization policy and make vastly more problematic than it already is by applying it to Islamist parties–at least that’s what one major faction of Democratic policy wonks is going to push for. It’s going to be “accommodation” city, and all under the guise of democratization.

Stanley Kurtz is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.

Most Popular

Culture

Equality and Envy

We are not the same. Neither men, nor women, nor races, nor ages, nor nationalities, nor in wealth, nor in training, nor in beauty. We are not equal in any way. And that is a reason to be proud and happy, because at the end of the day we are human and not the product of some factory. Let us once and for all ... Read More
Culture

Equality and Envy

We are not the same. Neither men, nor women, nor races, nor ages, nor nationalities, nor in wealth, nor in training, nor in beauty. We are not equal in any way. And that is a reason to be proud and happy, because at the end of the day we are human and not the product of some factory. Let us once and for all ... Read More

The Pollster Who Thinks Trump Is Ahead

The polling aggregator on the website RealClearPolitics shows the margin in polls led by Joe Biden in a blue font and the ones led by Donald Trump in red. For a while, the battleground states have tended to be uniformly blue, except for polls conducted by the Trafalgar Group. If you are a firm believer only in ... Read More

The Pollster Who Thinks Trump Is Ahead

The polling aggregator on the website RealClearPolitics shows the margin in polls led by Joe Biden in a blue font and the ones led by Donald Trump in red. For a while, the battleground states have tended to be uniformly blue, except for polls conducted by the Trafalgar Group. If you are a firm believer only in ... Read More
Elections

Biden Lies Again and Again

Joe Biden is a career liar and he lied some more in the debate, for instance when he dismissed the now well-supported New York Post story about Hunter Biden's business dealing as "a Russian plant." There is zero evidence for this. He offered this line: There are 50 former national intelligence folks who said ... Read More
Elections

Biden Lies Again and Again

Joe Biden is a career liar and he lied some more in the debate, for instance when he dismissed the now well-supported New York Post story about Hunter Biden's business dealing as "a Russian plant." There is zero evidence for this. He offered this line: There are 50 former national intelligence folks who said ... Read More