The Corner

Murkowski: Waste of Time for Senate to Vote on Repeal

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R., Alaska) thinks that the Senate should not concentrate on repealing Obamacare.

Saying that “we got to get to rid of it [Obamacare],” Murkowski then questioned the value of a Senate vote on repeal during an interview with Alaskan TV station KTVA.

“I don’t believe there are votes sufficient in the Senate to repeal health care reform,” she said. “And if there were, you’re still dealing with the president, whose signature domestic legislative accomplishment was the health-care bill. He’s not going to allow for the repeal. He would veto that.”

“Spending a lot of time on the messaging votes is not what I think the American public wants us to do,” she added.

Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell (R., Kentucky) has announced that he will work to have a Senate vote on the repeal passed by the House this week.

UPDATE: In response to Murkowski’s comments, Sen. Jim DeMint (R., S.C.) told Sean Hannity in a radio interview this afternoon that “we don’t have to spend a lot of time on it [the health care repeal vote].”

“What we need to do is make sure there is a vote on it so everyone in America knows where Democrats and Republicans stand. … It’s so important that we do it right away and show that Republicans are going to do what we promised last election,” DeMint added, noting that the House had shown a lot of “spine” in passing the repeal.

DeMint said that Senate Republicans “might get two or three” Democrats to vote for repeal, but citing the amount of pressure Senate Democrats were under, he concluded that it was possible no Democrats would vote for repeal.

Katrina Trinko — Katrina Trinko is a political reporter for National Review. Trinko is also a member of USA TODAY’S Board of Contributors, and her work has been published in various media outlets ...

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Demagoguery Is Not Leadership

The government of Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern in New Zealand has, with the support of the opposition, decided to enact fundamental changes in the nation’s firearms laws less than a week after the massacre at two Christchurch mosques. This is the opposite of leadership. It is also an example of why ... Read More
White House

The Media’s Disgrace

There will soon enough be an effort to memory-hole it, but the media coverage of the Russia investigation was abysmal and self-discrediting — obsessive and hysterical, often suggesting that the smoking gun was right around the corner, sometimes supporting its hoped-for result with erroneous, too-good-to-check ... Read More
U.S.

Political Theatrics

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Including all you whippersnappers under the age of 50), I’m writing this from somewhere over the Atlantic. At least I hope that’s ... Read More
Politics & Policy

What Was Trump So Annoyed About?

One of the stranger arguments that I heard throughout the Mueller saga -- and am hearing today, now that it's turned out to be a dud -- is that Donald Trump's irritation with the process was unreasonable and counterproductive. This tweet, from CNN's Chris Cilizza, is a nice illustration of the genre: Donald ... Read More