The Corner

Myth Making on Abortion

The Washington Post’s “five myths” column propagates myths at least as often as it debunks them, and today’s “five myths about abortion” adds to that dismal record.

Rickie Solinger claims, first, that abortion was generally legal in the U.S. until the mid-19th century and that restrictions on it did not reflect a concern for the right to life of unborn children but rather concern for maternal safety, obstetricians’ desire to kneecap their less-professional competitors, and so forth. For a longer treatment of the history of these claims and why they’re false, refer to the relevant chapter of my book. The short version: Abortion after quickening was always illegal at common law, and courts disagreed about the status of abortion before quickening (probably because of evidentiary problems that prosecutions in such cases presented at the time). The campaign to tighten abortion laws following advances in medical knowledge about pregnancy was indeed based on concern for fetal life. It’s why the physicians, for example, didn’t try to out-compete their rivals by performing abortions better than they did. Solinger’s claim that early feminists opposed abortion because they feared it as a threat to women’s chastity and thus their status in society — and not because of any concern for unborn life — is hard to square with, for example, the 1874 editorial on the subject titled ”The Slaughter of the Innocents” that ran in a feminist publication.

Solinger also writes, “According to the Guttmacher Institute, at least 1 million illegal abortions were performed in the United States each year before Roe.” Thus she claims that legalization of abortion did not increase its frequency substantially. I assume that she’s getting that figure from the same Guttmacher paper she cites earlier. Its actual claim: “Estimates of the number of illegal abortions in the 1950s and 1960s ranged from 200,000 to 1.2 million per year.” The high-end estimates have been debunked by Clarke Forsythe, who points out that, among other things, they do not match the relatively low numbers reported in the first years of legalization by states that moved before Roe. But the fact that Solinger can’t even accurately report what her source claims does not inspire confidence in her ability to evaluate the claim — or in her command of any of this material.

Ramesh Ponnuru — Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg View, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

White House

What Is Hillary Clinton Thinking?

When Homer Simpson looks in the mirror, he sees ripped chest muscles and arms like the trunks of beech trees. When Hillary Clinton looks in the mirror, she sees America’s sweetheart. She thinks: America adores me. She thinks: America already chose me to be president once! She thinks: Everyone is comparing me ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Grassley’s Kangaroo Court

So now it looks like next Thursday. On Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s manifestly meritorious nomination to the Supreme Court, what was supposed to be the vote out of the Senate Judiciary Committee this past Thursday now appears to be sliding into a hearing to be held next Thursday. Or, who knows, maybe a Thursday ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Censure Dianne Feinstein

Regardless of the fate of Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination, the Senate should censure the ranking Democratic member of the Judiciary Committee, Dianne Feinstein. Her deception and maneuvering, condemned across the political spectrum, seriously interfered with the Senate’s performance of its constitutional duty to ... Read More
U.S.

Are We on the Verge of Civil War?

Americans keep dividing into two hostile camps. It seems the country is back to 1860 on the eve of the Civil War, rather than in 2018, during the greatest age of affluence, leisure, and freedom in the history of civilization. The ancient historian Thucydides called the civil discord that tore apart the ... Read More