The Corner

Culture

‘Nature’s Rights’ Constitutional Amendment Proposed

The California secession movement is active again, gathering signatures for a vote.

One group, perhaps knowing that won’t happen, is pushing for changes to the U.S. Constitution, including a new amendment guaranteeing the “Nature’s rights.” From the Mercury News story:

The U.S. Constitution, the group says, should include a section entitled “Human Community Laws of Nature.” It should “declare that Nature is a freely living being with inalienable rights and that no individual, business entity, government, `owner,’ or organization shall inflict violence or servitude on her,” according to a working document posted online.

Before you are tempted to laugh, realize that the environmental movement is becoming increasingly anti-human and the “nature rights” movement is growing.

Thus, while I am almost sure–almost–that the Constitution will never be so amended, it would not surprise me at all if California or some other state that leans heavily to the port side passes such a law.

Also note, that two countries have enacted nature rights, and that the meme was supported by former UN Secretary General, Ban Ki Moon.

Meanwhile, at least three rivers have been declared to be “persons” with enforceable rights, as well as two glaciers. 

Nearly 40 US municipalities, including Santa Monica. These laws allow anyone to seek a court order enforcing the “rights of nature” by impeding development.

Oh, and one orangutan was declared a non-human person in Argentina and granted a writ of habeas corpus. 

Nature rights seeks to prevent humans thriving from the use of natural resources. It is a form of nature religion. It is also an ideological statement against human exceptionalism that declares us just another species in the forest.

In essence, this is a war on humans. We ignore the peril of the nature rights movement at our own peril. 

Most Popular

White House

Rachel Maddow’s Turnberry Tale

To a certain kind of Rachel Maddow viewer, there are few more titillating preludes to a news segment than the one she delivered Monday: “If you have not seen it yet, you are going to want to sit down.” Maddow’s story began, as many of her stories do, with President Trump, this time focused on his hotel ... Read More
Elections

The Problem with Pete Buttigieg

In a 2018 midterm election that didn’t give Republicans a lot to laugh about, one development that no doubt left them smiling was watching progressives across the country donate $80 million to Beto O’Rourke, in a Texas Senate race that was always going to be a steep uphill climb. Democratic party leaders can ... Read More