The Corner

Speculation Disguised as News

Here is the graphic on the front page of the New York Times’ website this morning:

What a remarkably precise estimate of where Neil Gorsuch fits in! This is one of the media’s worst habits — reporting gross speculation as if it were news. No one knows if Gorsuch will be more or less conservative than, say, Sam Alito, yet this kind of reporting will shape the narrative anyway.

The Times is using a study that predicts nominees’ voting records with a simple model — a very simple model. If I am reading them right, the authors of the study took the ideology of former Colorado senator Wayne Allard and assigned it wholesale to Gorsuch. The reason is that Allard was the only Republican senator from Gorsuch’s home state at the time of his nomination to the federal bench. That is the whole basis of the prediction. It apparently justifies a front-page graphic declaring exactly where Gorsuch — i.e., Wayne Allard incognito — would fit into the current Court.

I’m not knocking the study so much as the Times’ use of it. The prediction model offers some academic value, but what it does not offer is anything interesting about Neil Gorsuch. We know that Gorsuch will be a conservative justice based on his writings and personal background. What we do not know is where his voting record will be relative to the other conservatives on the Court. The Times would like us to believe, based on the Wayne Allard model, that Gorsuch will fall between Scalia (formerly) and Thomas. But the model itself fails on precise positioning. It predicted that Alito and Thomas would be equally conservative, for example, and that Scalia would be to the right of both of them. Those predictions are incorrect by the study’s own metrics.

In short, the Times’ assertion about Gorsuch’s ideology is just speculation disguised as news. That may seem harmless, but it’s what many false narratives are built upon.

Jason Richwine — Jason Richwine is a public-policy analyst and a contributor to National Review Online.

Most Popular

Film & TV

The Dan Crenshaw Moment

Given the spirit of our times, things could have gone so differently. On November 3, when Saturday Night Live comic Pete Davidson mocked Texas Republican Dan Crenshaw’s eye patch, saying he looked like a “hit man in a porno movie” — then adding, “I know he lost his eye in war or whatever” — it was a ... Read More

Fire Brenda Snipes

Brenda Snipes, the supervisor of elections in Florida’s Broward County, does not deserve to be within a thousand miles of any election office anywhere in these United States. She should be fired at the earliest possible opportunity. Snipes has held her position since 2003, in which year her predecessor, ... Read More

How Immigration Changes Britain

Almost nothing is discussed as badly in America or Europe as the subject of immigration. And one reason is that it remains almost impossible to have any sensible or rational public discussion of its consequences. Or rather it is eminently possible to have a discussion about the upsides (“diversity,” talent, ... Read More
PC Culture

The Lonely Mob

Just before the election, an Andrew Gillum intern named Shelby Shoup was arrested and charged with battery after assaulting some college Republicans on the campus of Florida State University. It was rather less exciting than that sounds: She went on a rant about “Nazis” and “fascism” — Gillum’s ... Read More

Sorry, Brian Kemp Still Won

Here was the state of play as of yesterday per the Kemp campaign’s breakdown of publicly available information: As of Saturday, November 10, 2018 (12:00 p.m.) *Information below is public.  Total votes reported: 3,924,658 Kemp: 1,975,162 (50.33%) Abrams: 1,912,383 (48.73%) Metz: ... Read More