The Corner

New Jersey Puts Efficiency Over Rights and Reasonable Debate

In a 2006 case, the New Jersey Supreme Court said the state had to give the benefits of marriage to same-sex couples under the state constitution. The legislature said fine, we’ll create civil unions. An advocacy group sued saying civil unions aren’t good enough. Today, a trial-court judge agreed.

Here’s the court’s logic:

The New Jersey Supreme Court said same-sex couples have to get all the benefits of marriage.

They get all the state benefits but not the federal benefits because the Obama administration (following the Supreme Court decision striking down DOMA) does not recognize civil unions as marriages.

The plaintiffs in this case could sue the federal government, but that would be a “costly and time-consuming litigation burden not required of opposite-sex married couples,” the court says.

Since it would be easier for New Jersey to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples so they can get federal marriage benefits, the state has to do so starting October 21.

It’s interesting that by striking down DOMA, the Supreme Court has emboldened the executive branch and at least this state court to create a new national marriage policy in favor of same-sex marriage. So much for the federalism that was supposedly so important in the DOMA case.

It’s also interesting that the burden of filing a lawsuit creates a constitutional burden so great as to sweep away any concern that New Jersey might have about redefining marriage. The near-universal understanding of marriage, including its endorsement of the principle that children are entitled to a married mother and father, must yield, the court thinks, to administrative efficiency in accessing government benefits.

All this, of course, against the backdrop of an ongoing legislative effort to get what the plaintiffs are seeking. Presumably it would also be unconstitutional to expect same-sex marriage advocates to persuade their representatives that their claims have merit. Convincing one judge is a lot simpler.

Most Popular


On Trade, No One Is Waiting for Washington

President Donald Trump’s flips and flops on trade are now as ubiquitous as his 5:00 a.m. tweets. Many predicted that trade-expansion efforts would come to a standstill and world commerce would suffer amidst all the uncertainty. Instead, the precise opposite has happened. In the last few months, it’s become ... Read More
National Security & Defense

Trump’s Syria Quandary

President Trump raised eyebrows recently when he ended a tweet lauding the airstrikes he’d ordered against chemical-weapons facilities in Syria with the words “mission accomplished.” The phrase, of course, became infamous in the aftermath of the invasion of Iraq, when President Bush used it in a speech ... Read More

Confirm Pompeo

What on earth are the Democrats doing? President Trump has nominated CIA director Mike Pompeo, eminently qualified by any reasonable standard, to be America’s 70th secretary of state. And yet the Senate Democrats, led by Chuck Schumer, have perverted the advice and consent clause of the Constitution into a ... Read More
PC Culture

People Are Losing Their Minds Over Starbucks

We can all easily imagine circumstances in which a manager of a coffee shop or restaurant might properly call the police to ask them to remove loiterers. These are places of business. There’s nothing wrong in principle with calling the cops on non-customers who are taking up space. And there’s nothing wrong ... Read More
PC Culture

The Dark Side of the Starbucks Stand-Down

By now the story is all over America. Earlier this month, two black men entered a Starbucks store in Philadelphia. They were apparently waiting for a friend before ordering — the kind of thing people do every day — and one of the men asked to use the restroom. A Starbucks employee refused, saying the restroom ... Read More