The Corner

Politics & Policy

New Jersey Democrats Abandon Tax Hike

New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy speaks after taking the oath of office in Trenton, New Jersey, January 16, 2018. (Lucas Jackson/Reuters)

Two core planks of the contemporary Democratic party are 1) a host of new, sprawling social programs and 2) a set of tax hikes on the rich to fund them. Just vote Republicans out of office, soak the rich, and use the proceeds to fund single-payer health care, free community college, and universal pre-kindergarten. Democrats are campaigning for offices local and national on that agenda. Can it be that easy? An article by Jeff Stein for the Washington Post suggests the answer is no.

“Democrats in the New Jersey state legislature approved a tax hike on millionaires five separate times under then-governor Chris Christie (R.) — knowing he would veto it,” Stein writes. “But now that the state has a liberal governor eager to sign the bill, Democratic legislators are backing off the ‘millionaire’s tax.’” In the words of Democratic state senator Steve Sweeney, who had been instrumental in shepherding through the tax while Christie was in office, New Jersey’s millionaires are simply “taxed out.”

Maybe they are. Millionaires in New Jersey might not feel rich: Their state, local, and property taxes are high compared with the rest of the country, as is their cost of living. Many have seen their federal taxes rise after the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act capped the state-and-local tax deduction at $10,000. They might even define themselves as “upper-middle class.” But if Democratic politicians want to implement the social programs they campaign on, they’ll have to raise taxes on high-income earners — including millionaires in New Jersey.

There is a fairly obvious tension here for the Democratic party: It relies on the support of upper-middle class Americans, yet implementing its social agenda would require those Americans, not just billionaire bogeymen, to pay more in taxes. As Megan McArdle writes, “Democrats are going to have to either give up their big dreams or hand those voters the bill, because they’re the ones with most of the money.”

It’s easy to pass a “millionaire’s tax” when you know the governor will veto it. It’s easy to insist that a national jobs-guarantee program will be fully funded by raising taxes on the 1 percent. But an ambitious social agenda — whether at the state or federal level — requires an ambitious tax-hike regime to fund it. Across the country, Democrats are campaigning on the former. But they don’t yet have to deal with the reality of the latter. As the case of New Jersey demonstrates, confronting the reality of raising taxes on your constituents is harder than it sounds. If the party is serious about its Scandinavian-style social programs, it’ll have to get serious about tax hikes.

Most Popular


Yes, Hillary Should Have Been Prosecuted

I know this is ancient history, but — I’m sorry — I just can’t let it go. When historians write the definitive, sordid histories of the 2016 election, the FBI, Hillary, emails, Russia, and Trump, there has to be a collection of chapters making the case that Hillary should have faced a jury ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Yes, There Was FBI Bias

There is much to admire in Justice Department inspector general Michael Horowitz’s highly anticipated report on the FBI’s Clinton-emails investigation. Horowitz’s 568-page analysis is comprehensive, fact-intensive, and cautious to a fault. It is also, nonetheless, an incomplete exercise — it omits half ... Read More

Let the World Have Soccer

The United States of America did not qualify for the World Cup this year. Good for us. Soccer is corrupt, hyper-regulated, impoverished by a socialist-style fondness for rationing, and organized to strangle human flourishing. It is so dependent on the whims of referees that is in effect a helpless captive of the ... Read More
Economy & Business

Asymmetrical Capitalism

I like to think of American Airlines CEO Doug Parker as my pen pal, but, in truth, he never writes back. It’s a lopsided relationship — asymmetrical, in a word. I have for many years argued that most people would be enthusiastic about capitalism if not for their interactions with a small number of ... Read More

Child Separation at the Border

If you want to read a thoughtful and constructive explanation and partial defense of the policies being implemented by the White House, you should read this piece by Rich Lowry. If you want to read a trollish and counter-productive screed fit for a comment section, read the White House’s official press ... Read More

Staying on the Path

Dear Reader (Including those of you who are no longer my personal lawyer), Almost 20 years ago, I wrote in this space that the movie A Simple Plan was one of the most conservative movies of the 1990s. In case you haven’t seen it, the plot is pretty straightforward, almost clichéd. It focuses on three men ... Read More