The Corner

Elections

New Poll: Jeff Denham’s Hispanic Constituents Don’t Want His Amnesty

Congressman Jeff Denham (Image courtesy of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee/Handout via Reuters )

Rep. Jeff Denham (R., Calif.) is in a tough re-election fight. He won by three points in 2016 in a district Hillary carried by the same margin. His district, centered on Modesto, is about 40 percent Hispanic.

That last fact explains his leading role in trying to get a “Dreamer” amnesty passed through the House. Working with the Democrats, he is pushing a discharge petition which, if it gets 218 signatures, would force the leadership to bring up four immigration bills for a vote, and whichever one passed with the largest number of votes would be enacted. (This is the so-called queen-of-the-hill rule.) Without going into detail, Denham’s hope is that the amnesty bill he has co-sponsored, H.R. 4796, would be the one to get the most votes. That bill would pair an amnesty even more expansive than the 1.8 million illegal aliens that the president has agreed to, with some unremarkable border-security window-dressing that would do nothing to contain the fallout of the amnesty.

In effect, Denham’s gambit is a way to negate the Hastert Rule, under which leadership pledges not to bring up for a vote any measure that doesn’t have the support of a majority of the Republican caucus. If all the Democrats support an amnesty, then it could pass even if 90 percent of Republicans vote against it.

Denham’s alliance with the Democrats to push the discharge petition has divided Republicans. Even though the bill probably won’t even be brought up in the Senate, let alone signed by the president, if the Republican House passed an illegal-alien amnesty almost entirely with Democratic votes it’d be likely to outrage some Republican voters, demoralize others, and generally kill the momentum that now points to the recently unthinkable possibility that the GOP could actually retain its House majority in November. The House leadership seems to understand this; as Politico describes comments by the House Majority Leader, “Passing a bipartisan immigration bill that the base hates, McCarthy argued, would depress Republican turnout, and possibly cost the party the House.”

So if Denham is trying to save his own electoral skin at the price of splitting his party and helping elect Nancy Pelosi as Speaker again, then his approach to a “Dreamer” amnesty must be super popular among the Hispanic voters he’s trying to attract, right?

Wrong.

A new poll by Pulse Opinion Research (toplines here, crosstabs here) shows that Hispanic voters in Denham’s 10th Congressional District oppose his approach and support instead the Goodlatte bill’s approach, the one endorsed by the president and supported by most House Republicans.

Here are the two questions offering competing approaches to a “Dreamer” amnesty bill (I’ve inserted the sponsors’ names; they weren’t mentioned in the survey):

[Goodlatte approach]: “Would you support a bill that legalized certain young-adult illegal immigrants brought to the United States as children and that also reduced future annual immigration by ending chain migration and by mandating that employers use E-Verify to prevent them from hiring illegal workers?” Hispanics: 58% yes, 22% no, 20% not sure.

[Denham approach]: “Would you support a bill that legalized certain young-adult illegal immigrants brought to the United States as children, but continued Chain Migration, kept total immigration at one million a year and allowed employers to hire without checking legal status with E-Verify?” Hispanics: 38% yes, 50% no, 13% not sure.

The Goodlatte approach received at least plurality support from every subgroup and a majority from most; the Denham approach received plurality support, barely, only from self-identified liberals.

Denham’s ignorance of the views of his own Hispanic constituents suggest his partnership with Democrats to pass an amnesty through the House might well hand the majority to Nancy Pelosi  while failing to secure his own job.

Mark Krikorian, a nationally recognized expert on immigration issues, has served as Executive Director of the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) since 1995.

Most Popular

Elections

The Jerry Springer Debate

It’s a shame that Joe Biden couldn’t attend Tuesday night's debate. Okay, Biden was in attendance, but during the 90 minutes, it felt like he barely ever finished a complete sentence. It’s not clear that President Trump necessarily won the night, in the sense that people who were leaning against ... Read More
Elections

The Jerry Springer Debate

It’s a shame that Joe Biden couldn’t attend Tuesday night's debate. Okay, Biden was in attendance, but during the 90 minutes, it felt like he barely ever finished a complete sentence. It’s not clear that President Trump necessarily won the night, in the sense that people who were leaning against ... Read More
Elections

Trump Did Himself No Favors

The debate was a remarkable example of the fact that Donald Trump, the most self-serving man in America, doesn’t know how to do himself any favors. For the first ten or twelve minutes of the debate, he was walking away with it — Trumpy, sure, but in control and surprisingly reasonable-sounding. If he had ... Read More
Elections

Trump Did Himself No Favors

The debate was a remarkable example of the fact that Donald Trump, the most self-serving man in America, doesn’t know how to do himself any favors. For the first ten or twelve minutes of the debate, he was walking away with it — Trumpy, sure, but in control and surprisingly reasonable-sounding. If he had ... Read More
Elections

Everybody Loses, Which Helps Biden

Reactions to tonight's debate will likely be deeply polarized, as everything else is. There are a few things that are clear. One, this was probably the worst presidential debate in American history. There was a ton of cross-talk and shouting down, there were many bald-faced lies and obvious evasions, a former ... Read More
Elections

Everybody Loses, Which Helps Biden

Reactions to tonight's debate will likely be deeply polarized, as everything else is. There are a few things that are clear. One, this was probably the worst presidential debate in American history. There was a ton of cross-talk and shouting down, there were many bald-faced lies and obvious evasions, a former ... Read More

Chaos in Cleveland

The 90 minutes of “debate” between President Donald Trump and former vice president Joe Biden cannot be told as a cohesive story, or reduced to a few bottom lines. It was too fast and too disorganized. Almost anyone watching would have just picked up impressions along the way. I’ve grouped mine into piles ... Read More

Chaos in Cleveland

The 90 minutes of “debate” between President Donald Trump and former vice president Joe Biden cannot be told as a cohesive story, or reduced to a few bottom lines. It was too fast and too disorganized. Almost anyone watching would have just picked up impressions along the way. I’ve grouped mine into piles ... Read More
Elections

On Last Night’s Debate

The fact that I believe the debate was unwatchable last night does not mean I believe President Trump did not have some good moments. And the fact that I imagine it was a net-net win for Joe Biden does not mean he did not have some utterly awful moments. Yet the unwatchability of the debate -- the cringe factor ... Read More
Elections

On Last Night’s Debate

The fact that I believe the debate was unwatchable last night does not mean I believe President Trump did not have some good moments. And the fact that I imagine it was a net-net win for Joe Biden does not mean he did not have some utterly awful moments. Yet the unwatchability of the debate -- the cringe factor ... Read More
Elections

Actually, The Debate Was About Issues

I know. A lot of folks are saying the debate was an ugly, insult-filled shouting match that barely got down to cases. Actually, I thought it was a highly entertaining exchange that helpfully spotlighted the candidates’ differences on issues. An ugly, angry exchange? Well, at least it looked like America. If you ... Read More
Elections

Actually, The Debate Was About Issues

I know. A lot of folks are saying the debate was an ugly, insult-filled shouting match that barely got down to cases. Actually, I thought it was a highly entertaining exchange that helpfully spotlighted the candidates’ differences on issues. An ugly, angry exchange? Well, at least it looked like America. If you ... Read More
Elections

Who Wins an Unwatchable Debate?

Over coffee this morning I read a fascinating interview with Martin Gurri, the former CIA analyst who first noticed the seismic impact of social media on world politics. The author of The Revolt of the Public and the Crisis of Authority in the New Millennium, Gurri studies the fracturing of discourse and the ... Read More
Elections

Who Wins an Unwatchable Debate?

Over coffee this morning I read a fascinating interview with Martin Gurri, the former CIA analyst who first noticed the seismic impact of social media on world politics. The author of The Revolt of the Public and the Crisis of Authority in the New Millennium, Gurri studies the fracturing of discourse and the ... Read More